User talk:Adam mugliston/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

MfD nomination of User:Adam mugliston/Lists of bus routes/Basingstoke

User:Adam mugliston/Lists of bus routes/Basingstoke, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Adam mugliston/Lists of bus routes/Basingstoke and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Adam mugliston/Lists of bus routes/Basingstoke during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Charles (talk) 22:02, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Adam mugliston/Lists of bus routes/Huntingdon

User:Adam mugliston/Lists of bus routes/Huntingdon, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Adam mugliston/Lists of bus routes/Huntingdon and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Adam mugliston/Lists of bus routes/Huntingdon during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Charles (talk) 22:05, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Adam mugliston/Lists of bus routes/Winchester

User:Adam mugliston/Lists of bus routes/Winchester, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Adam mugliston/Lists of bus routes/Winchester and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Adam mugliston/Lists of bus routes/Winchester during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Charles (talk) 22:07, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Adam mugliston/List of bus routes in Clacton-on-Sea

User:Adam mugliston/List of bus routes in Clacton-on-Sea, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Adam mugliston/List of bus routes in Clacton-on-Sea and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Adam mugliston/List of bus routes in Clacton-on-Sea during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 20:59, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Buses in Ipswich. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 21:07, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

The material in question is fully sourced. In future, please take care to read any material you wish to remove, prior to removing it.  Adam Mugliston  talk  21:50, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Look unsourced or not whatever!, Route lists don't belong on WP!,

Disruptive editing could lead to a block Mr Mugliston so I'd read WP:DISRUPTIVE EDITING If I were you!. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:39, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Please don't raise your tone too much when it is not necessary. Please familiarise yourself with the material you disagree with and decide on which policy it really violates, before accusing others of disruptive editing.  Adam Mugliston  talk  22:46, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Hey now, what is going on here? Davey, please could you explain on the article talk page why you object to the material in question?

For obvious reasons, I also suggest you both stop editing the article until the conclusion of that discussion. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:53, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm not raising my tone tho?, It's considered route lists are directory's which I put in the edit summary WP:NOTDIR, It's also assumed if people need route info they'd check operators site - Not Wikipedia,

Adam knows all this which is why I found it pointless raising it with him again ?

→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 23:21, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

You decided what was in his head, and on that basis you decided whether discussion was or was not necessary? Would you like to explain that to me one more time? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

I would like to point out that WP:NOTDIR states that "Wikipedia also includes reference tables", which is something such a list is. It also mentions that "Lists of loosely associated topics" are against policy and a list of bus routes is not a loosely associated topic. . A directory is something one would use to search for a particular item, something a list of bus routes cannot provide. It is more of an overview of the services provided as part of a prose article on the subject. This is something I hope to expand on with other towns in future. The list is also fully sourced and satisfies issues raised in the past.  Adam Mugliston  talk  23:32, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

No!, He's been through this before with others ..... So If he knows this I fail to see why I or others should retell him over and over and over and over? ......

Read WP:NOTGUIDE & WP:FANCRUFT whilst you're at it! -
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 23:42, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Could you please decide which policy you claim the material violates? You seem to be giving different reasons all the time.  Adam Mugliston  talk  08:38, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

WP:NOTGUIDE states that "An article on Paris should mention landmarks, such as the Eiffel Tower and the Louvre, but not the telephone number or street address of the "best" restaurants, nor the current price of a café au lait on the Champs-Élysées." In the same way, a lists of bus routes mentions the routes, however does not give every street or bus stop served, nor the ticket price. WP:FANCRUFT states that "As with most of the issues of What Wikipedia is not in Wikipedia, there is no firm policy on the inclusion of obscure branches of popular culture subjects. It is true that things labeled fancruft are often deleted from Wikipedia. This is primarily because articles labeled as fancruft are often poorly written, unwikified, non-neutral, unreferenced, or contain original research." Since there is no firm policy on what counts as fancruft, there is not much of a case with buses. As quoted, the reason for the usual deletion of fancruft is due to their unencyclopedic nature: being poorly written, being unreferenced or non-neutral. The list of bus routes in question is not either of those things. It is fully reference, it is neutral and is not poorly written.  Adam Mugliston  talk  09:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Give up & accept the fact route lists are uncyclopedic & not needed nor wanted & will be removed by me or others!, →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 14:16, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

This encyclopaedia is not owned by anyone, so it doesn't matter if a small group of people don't want it. You saying that and saying that you will remove it shows that you don't like it, but are currently unable to show a valid policy that shows that lists of bus routes should not be here.  Adam Mugliston  talk  15:44, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Buses in Ipswich. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 16:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

I think I know what's going on and a template message is really unnecessary.  Adam Mugliston  talk  16:24, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Buses in Ipswich

Please engage on the talk page of this article. You're at 3RR now by the way (not beyond it as my edit summary suggested - sorry about that) if you really want a policy to refer to. I think WP:CONSENSUS is probably worth a look as well. Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:28, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

The violated 3RR was simply replacing the constructive edits by yourself and Charles' adjustment of the prose, which I deleted by mistake. I have said the same on the article's talk page.  Adam Mugliston  talk  16:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

As noted on the article talk, I think at least one rvt from me went astray given the timings of edits. Let's deal with this on the article talk page now - remember that 3RR doesn't just deal with actual reversions but also adding or removing content a set number of times. I really, really don't want to play a heavy hand on 3RR - I don't think that's constructive. Take a look at the couple of articles I've linked to on the article and let's see if we can build something similar to these. Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:50, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. --Mdann52talk to me!

This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:00, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello, Adam mugliston:

WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. EdwardsBot (talk) 09:10, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) at 09:10, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list

Hello Adam mugliston! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Adam mugliston/List of C roads

User:Adam mugliston/List of C roads, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Adam mugliston/List of C roads and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Adam mugliston/List of C roads during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.-→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 17:06, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Adam mugliston/Portsmouth

User:Adam mugliston/Portsmouth, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Adam mugliston/Portsmouth and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Adam mugliston/Portsmouth during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.-→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 17:06, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive

Hello Adam mugliston:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

The AfC helper script can assist you in tallying your edits automatically. To view a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Sent on behalf of (t) Josve05a (c) by {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} using the MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Quixotic plea

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 03:37, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User talk:Adam mugliston/Rcsprinter123

User talk:Adam mugliston/Rcsprinter123, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Adam mugliston/Rcsprinter123 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User talk:Adam mugliston/Rcsprinter123 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 20:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Davey2010, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. –Davey2010^Talk 19:24, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Blocked for 24 hours. Cannot access own talk page. This user went on such a sudden and uncharacteristic spree of vandalism that I believe it is possible the account was compromised. --MelanieN (talk) 19:32, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Adam mugliston. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Adam mugliston! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 01:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)