Welcome!

edit
Hello, Abracadabra777! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 04:13, 28 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

January 2011

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Rupert Sheldrake has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnA8GUtXpXY. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:13, 28 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Pink slime

edit

Please don't remove referenced info from articles. --John (talk) 19:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

John,

Your references are worthless. Both of the references you provided are junk articles. Just because something is written in "The Independent" by someone, doesn't mean they know what they are talking about. Both articles include the picture that is not pink slime, so why are we trusting their fact-checking? There is none. Plus Mechanically separated meat is different than LFTB, your inclusion or irrelevant facts confuses the article. The fact that mechanically separated meat is banned has nothing to do with LFTB. It is a horrible argument. Can't you make your points about the product using relevant information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abracadabra777 (talkcontribs) 22:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

I suggest making your points at article talk. --John (talk) 23:49, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

December 2014

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Pink slime shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 22:47, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

February 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm FreeRangeFrog. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rick Ross (consultant), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx