Blocked as a sockpuppet edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:WassimDoureihi per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WassimDoureihi. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit (blether) 13:47, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abmoza (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I received an alert saying JBW left a message on my talk page. But I see no message from JBW...

Decline reason:

Duplicate. Each time you make a comment, please do not use the unblock template. Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:26, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abmoza (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet of WassimDoureihi (I have nothing to do with him) and I apologize for what I did. I am completely unexperienced in Wikipedia (using). I used a random page to discover things like how to edit a page, how to modify, etc in order to increase my experience in Wikipedia. Therefore, I am asking for an unblock. If I was mistaken, this will never be repeated again and I will contribute to the Wikipedia community instead. My apologies. Abmoza (talk) 15:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This unblock request doesn't make sense. Why are you apologizing for what you did if you're not a sock puppet? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abmoza (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

As a reply to NinjaRobotPirate : I am unexperienced in using Wikipedia and it is the first time I am using Wikipedia English. This is why I thought there were other reasons than the "sockpuppet" accusation (which I completely reject and deny) to block me, now that I know I made no other mistakes, indeed, there is no need for me to apologize. To make it clear, I am an independant account which have no link to other accounts, which doesn't work as a (sock) puppet of any account and editing for the first time in English Wikipedia in a random Wikipedia page to increase my experience in Wikipedia using.

Decline reason:

It sounds from your first sentence, sockpuppet or not, like you might not be up to this. You might want to edit the Wikipedia in your native language. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:05, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abmoza (talk) 14:38, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abmoza (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

As a reply to Daniel Case : Not necessarily, I just need to increase my experience in Wikipedia using. It doesn't matter whether it is in English or other language. By the way, is this blocking going to be forever ? I mean, is there no hope that one day I will be unblocked ? Because it seems that I am definively blocked...

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, after discussion with blocking admin I must decline. Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:54, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion edit

I find your assertion of not being connected to the sock puppets on Hizb ut-Tahrir dubious. You claim it was a random article and that you just happened to support the other socks in an edit war. Well, let's hold that in abeyance. Assuming you are WP:TOPICBANned from that article and related topics, what constructive edits would you make if we unblock you. Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:31, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I find your assertion of not being connected to the sock puppets on Hizb ut-Tahrir dubious. You claim it was a random article and that you just happened to support the other socks in an edit war.
The "support" was unintentionnal. I had neither the intention to support any puppet account nor did I voluntary engaged in an edit war. It was accidental, I have strictly nothing to do with other accounts and it was just to increase my experience in Wikipedia using and to discover how Wikipedia editing actually works...
Well, let's hold that in abeyance. Assuming you are WP:TOPICBANned from that article and related topics, what constructive edits would you make if we unblock you.
Speaking in the long term : If you unblock me, I may improve existing Wikipedia pages by making minor or major edits (making an article less biased, more neutral, with more sources, more consistent with Wikipedia rules or making it a featured article). I might (also) create new articles in differents fields (mathematics, science, etc.) which may be useful to the others. Abmoza (talk) 00:12, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Girth Summit: OK to unblock with topic an on Hizb ut-Tahrir ? Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:42, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Deepfriedokra I have to say that I find this unblock request unpersuasive. The account is almost two years old, and it suddenly became active to reinstate 33kb of contested text that a sockpuppeteer was edit warring over - I'd be looking for a much more fulsome explanation than 'I'm new, I was just experimenting on a random page'. Put me down as opposing an unblock until an actually persuasive unblock request is forthcoming. Girth Summit (blether) 00:08, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Will likely decline on that basis. Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:48, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply