Welcome! edit

Hello, Abdulwahab Mohammed Azzam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 15:12, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Several linguists have collaborated on phonological research on the Quran. Please do not delete our entries or raise sockpuppetry complaints.Abdulwahab Mohammed Azzam (talk) 14:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation edit

 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abdulwahab Mohammed Azzam, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Eperoton (talk) 14:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Policy edit

According to Wikipedia policy (WP:DR and WP:BRD), you have to obtain consensus for disputed additions on the article talk page instead of repeatedly trying to add them to the article. In this case, I doubt that you will be able to do that, because the addition violates the policies cited in the edit descriptions of the reverts. If you want to try gaining consensus for it, you should familiarize yourself with those policies and explain on the article talk page why you don't think you're violating them here. Eperoton (talk) 14:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Repeated policy violations edit

This is your third and final warning to stop violating policies brought to your attention in the previous warnings. If you persist in ignoring them, the next incident will be reported to the administrator noticeboard. Eperoton (talk) 03:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reply edit

Hello. Our team of linguists has made contributions to muqatta'at, citing the Hebrew Theory of one of our team https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/593714. You have deleted this important contribution several times. Do you object to the publication of hypotheses that the unexplained letters in the Quran may be spoken in Hebrew?

I have no comment on the content. I'm objecting to your policy violations. I find it hard to believe that someone who writes research papers in English should be incapable of reading and understanding the Wikipedia policies you have already been pointed to several times by multiple editors here. WP:OR states that Wikipedia is not the place for publishing original research. WP:RS lays out criteria for acceptable supporting publications, which are not met by your citations. WP:NOTPROMOTION states that Wikipedia is not a forum for promoting one's own work. Why are you having so much difficulty understanding that? Eperoton (talk) 17:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply