AbdulQuddus1
March 2023 edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to LGBT in Islam have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: LGBT in Islam was changed by AbdulQuddus1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882305 on 2023-03-30T11:22:29+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:22, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at LGBT in Islam. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 11:39, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- My edits were purely constructive.
- I indicated the evidence of the completely contrary position to the false information posted previously
- There can be no doubt that those references are taken from classical texts
- The fault can be found only in the lack of fluency in JavaScript AbdulQuddus1 (talk) 11:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia edit
I found this site (historically) to be a wonderful resource of truth when it was first made available to the public. Recently I am confronted with an abundance of outright misrepresentations using prejudiced and unethical citations of references that are published works by some who hold views in agreement with wiki posting individuals. The referential wikipedia that I could use as a resource has now changed to a website of opinion based rants. My posts which used well known and universally accepted references have been abusively edited by thoroughly educated but egregiously misrepresentative editors who have been attributed with scholarly renown. I love education and I prospectively look forward to reasonable mentoring as to my editing methodology, but I cannot concede to false representations of subjects of tremendous import while I have sound knowledge of such subject and reasonable capacity to effect clarifying representation. I look forward to your response. AbdulQuddus1 (talk) 11:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- For Wikipedia it is true what the Ivy League says it's true. tgeorgescu (talk) 12:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)