October 2015 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from European Newspaper Publishers Association. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:37, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Odd, seems my other edits were lost. ANTBU (talk) 19:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

ANTBU, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi ANTBU! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please be aware of the sanctions edit

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to electronic cigarettes.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

QuackGuru (talk) 18:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

What is this about? I haven't done anything on ecigs? ANTBU (talk) 21:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Nicotine is related to e-cigs.
"E-cigarettes: Safe to recommend to patients?". Cleve Clin J Med. 82 (8): 521–6. 2015. doi:10.3949/ccjm.82a.14054. PMID 26270431. Nicotine plays a direct role in carcinogenesis through a variety of mechanisms, including increasing the activity of tumor growth-promoting transcription factors, decreasing apoptosis, and increasing angiogenesis in tumors. Additionally, specific types of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors— eg, alpha 7 receptors, which are stimulated by nicotine—are found in many malignant tumors and are thought to play a role in tumor progression.12 Blockade of alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors has been shown to decrease the growth of certain cancers. However, these findings were from in vitro studies, and the concerns they raised have not been reflected in in vivo studies. Despite having been on the market for 30 years, nicotine replacement therapy has as yet not been associated with any "real world" increase in cancer risk. {{cite journal}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors= (help)
This is a quote from the source. There is a discussion on the talk page. See Talk:Nicotine#Recent_edits_about_lab_studies_about_cancer. Thanks. QuackGuru (talk) 03:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply