AMassiveNerd
Proposed deletion of The Hazeley Herald edit
The article The Hazeley Herald has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No sources. No credible claim of significance.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:44, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of The Hazeley Herald edit
The article The Hazeley Herald has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable student publication. Only ten Google hits, no evidence of anything resembling substantial coverage in independent reliable sources to meet WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 00:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
January 2017 edit
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sargon of Akkad, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. JudeccaXIII (talk) 00:57, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of The Hazeley Herald for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Hazeley Herald is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hazeley Herald until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:08, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
AMassiveNerd, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi AMassiveNerd! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC) |
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Riddleton, Tennessee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 16:54, 29 January 2017 (UTC)