January 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm NeemNarduni2. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User:NeemNarduni2 have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 19:20, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

                   That is okay, but could you please keep the REMO page.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/REMO Band. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 20:43, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation

edit
 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bigpickleman, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 22:01, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply