Virgin 1

edit

City In Fear is actually a US import, produced by '44 Blue Productions' and previously shown on 'MSNBC' (http://www.44blue.com/)

Extremely Out Of Control is also a US import, from 'Discovery' (http://www.alfredhaber.com/programs/m_extreme-out-control.html)

80.7.76.9 (talk) 16:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ah and there was me thinking V1 had made some more shows themsleves, thanks for the info i've corrected the page --AJFurnell (talk) 13:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Rexy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Kendrick7talk 17:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

No problem, I know you from Digi Spy btw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ben.hermenator (talkcontribs) 17:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

awesome!

edit

Thanks a lot!pd_THOR | =/\= | 01:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Viewing shares

edit

Please read the referenced source from BARB. It says:

* = figures are small but not zero

For decimal figures, where the actual value for a statistic is greater than zero but less than the value which would round to the smallest decimal used for the set of figures, * indicates a figure between zero and the smallest figure shown.

Where hour and minutes are shown, * indicates that the recorded figure is between zero and half a minute.

Therefore a channel with "*" in the columns, has a share between 0 and 0.1% Pleas stop providing inaccurate information. Astronaut (talk) 18:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

read your talk page,

I did. The information you are providing is inaccurate. A * indicates a share between 0 and 0.1%. Astronaut (talk) 18:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

You are trying to give the channel a better share than it deserves and trying to put it in the same league as Five Life +1 and others that can actually make a share of 0.0%, If BAAB thought it was worthy of 0.0% than they would put that, the fact they haven’t means that even putting it is being generous. Oh and stop putting times in next to the shows how many times do you need telling, Wikipedia is not a tv guide --AJFurnell (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

No I'm not trying to give the channel a better share than what you think it "deserves". There are channels with a 0.0% share (which looks a lot like zero viewers to me), but the footnote clearly states that * is a figure that is small but not zero. I suppose I am asking, why do you think 0.0% is in some kind of higher "league" than *?
I do know there are more than zero viewers. I have read elsewhere that Anime Central has attracted around 10,000 viewers per night though I don't know how accurate that figure is or whether that is some extraordinary peak in the viewing figures. but I make that around 0.015% (of 60 million potential viewers) ie. it is not 0.0%.
As for the times, I know Wikipedia is not a TV guide. However, the channel is sometimes unable to provide accurate information about the current schedule either on it's own website or through Sky's programme guide, therefore that information is useful to readers and I think it should stay.
Astronaut (talk) 19:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Having made a case to keep the times, I noticed you removed them again quoting policy. The policy is pretty clear, so lets leave it like that for a while and see if any other editors feel the times are useful. Astronaut (talk) 20:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Zattoo

edit

Hi. I'm using your Zattoo article as template for the spanish article in the spanish wikipedia. I'd like you to notice me when you finish the History section to update the translation, thanks. (Please use es:Usuario_Discusión:YoaR to msg me)

YoaR (talk) 11:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009

edit

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 17:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

edit

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

edit

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:25, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

edit

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:26, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Foolin

edit

Good tips about that archiving stuff, thanks. Bib (talk) 08:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

edit

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:10, 26 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

edit

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:00, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply