You have removed some factual information on the Keith Ellison article, and have given the reason that it is racist. I fail to understand why this is racist, it is documented and deserves to be mentioned on this encylopedia. Please read about Wikipedia's policy of Neutral point of view; you will see that the information you removed is not viewed as biased. Phl 16:53, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
I don't mean to sound rude, but you don't seem to understand the meaning of racism. I am not being racist in my edits; I have no problem with blacks or muslims. In fact, you have no reason to believe that I have any problem with Ellison at all. I am not focusing my edits on his race and religion, but what he has done in the past. Are you aware that the charges against Ellison are factual? If you are, then why have you removed them, being that they are true and relevant?
I don't want this to erupt into a political battle, I am only trying to keep the article neutral. Can we compromise and agree on changing the wording of the article? Is there any information about Ellison not in the article right now that you wish to add? Phl 20:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)