A belated welcome! edit

 
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, AB120399! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Pbritti (talk) 20:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Stop adding unsourced content edit

Wikipedia relies on WP:Verifiability as its core policy. Adding unsourced content or betraying what the sources say is a violation of this policy. Veverve (talk) 09:23, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2023 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Death and funeral of Pope Benedict XVI. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not WP:EDITWAR and go against WP:consensus. Veverve (talk) 03:18, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Death and state funeral of Pope John Paul II, you may be blocked from editing. This is the last warning. Veverve (talk) 03:37, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#AB120399: edit war, adds back unsourced information despite numerous removals, violates BURDEN regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 12:04, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72h for edit-warring over persistent addition of unsourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  User:Ymblanter (talk) 11:29, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

While I am somewhat sympathetic to the cause, Ymblanter blocked you correctly. But I'm afraid that might not be the end of it. I've looked through your contributions and there's only one or two that haven't been reverted; most of your edits were reverted because of insufficient, improper, or even deceitful sourcing. That cannot be. Also unacceptable is your edit warring and your refusal to discuss things with other editors. So here is my word of wisdom to you: if you continue with this behavior after your block expires, you are likely to be blocked indefinitely, per WP:NOTHERE for instance--because you need to accept the rules and play by them. Please don't let it get that far. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 16:36, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Drmies and Ymblanter: the user has done it again, with the exact same FICTREF; see [1] and [2]. I think a sanction is needed, the user is NOTHERE. Veverve (talk) 15:22, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 15:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply