99.57.180.205

February 2020

Hello, I'm Darkwarriorblake. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Shawshank Redemption have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 23:13, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Shawshank Redemption. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 23:13, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Shawshank Redemption, you may be blocked from editing. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 23:13, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Shawshank Redemption. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 23:13, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Masem (t) 23:54, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

99.57.180.205 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was mistakenly blocked for "vandalism". I was correctly citing the source of an opinion in article that failed to do so. As it stands now, the article is misrepresenting the opinion of one person as the general consensus (which is not the case). I should not have been blocked and that article still needs to be repaired.

Decline reason:

I would want to know how you will handle editing disputes in the future before removing the block early. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 02:16, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---