Ricchi e Poveri edit

The question is, will you stop stalking IvanScrooge98? It's his edits that are correct, not yours. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 09:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Plus, he doesn't hide his identity. You, on the other hand, use hundreds of IP adresses to conceal your edit history. That ain't cool, bruh. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 11:05, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

You haven't understood.
IvanScrooge98's edits ARE correct, YOURS aren't. You're stalkingly keeping an eye on IvanScrooge98's contributions, don't deny it, and when you don't like something he does properly you either modify his text or even revert his changes. You did it this morning too, in Help:IPA/Ligurian, IvanScrooge98's the only user with whom you act like that.
Plus, I don't know whom you mistook me for but if there's really someone doing what you've said he's worse than you, this doesn't mean you aren't doing the same, so don't turn this around because you did what I've said in lots of articles short after IvanScrooge98's new edits, even if you hadn't ever edited such articles before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.56.95.155 (talk) 15:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough. Please provide examples of this (the diffs and how my edits/reverts are incorrect). Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 15:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough. IvanScrooge98's edit was right, you reverted it. IvanScrooge98's edit was correct, you had to change it. Not to talk about the stalking in Bohuslän article. And 5 minutes after IvanScrooge98's edits in Stellan Skarsgård article you suddently appeared there too. So either IvanScrooge98's edits are actually disruptive and someone should take measures about it but I don't think so, or you've decided on your own to start this pointless stalking against one of the best contributors about phonemic and phonetic transcriptions. With all the vandals, either trolls or uneducated, who edit here every day you've chosen to focus your efforts on such an excellent contributor, I wonder if there's something personal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.56.95.155 (talk) 16:27, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Oookay. Feel free to report me. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 16:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Nice to see you again, G-Zay. This isn't the first time you're falsely accusing me of harassing or stalking, so be more original next time. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 17:57, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
You, IvanScrooge98's stalker, who accused me at the beginning of being IvanScrooge98's stalker, are now accusing me of being a blocked troll who stalked you 5 years ago, as far as I could see. I've never thought to find something weird as a stalker who feels stalked. The world doesn't turn around you, in both meanings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.56.95.155 (talk) 18:30, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Every single edit of yours has been about me (in one way or another), so it's hard to believe that your world doesn't revolve around me and the wish to get me banned on WP. Your accusations are silly and you haven't provided a single piece of proper evidence to back up your claims. I can start a SI like I did in the past, but you'll be back anyway, with another IP of a private proxy. Or won't you? Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 18:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Said the one who was blocked in the German encyclopedia for, let me Google-translate, "bad insults in the aftermath". Eat. I've never expressed a personal judgement about you, unlike you've done with me. I've just reported facts, you've accused me of being a troll and threatened to signal me although I've never made vandalisms. But let me ask you what would you think of a user who stalks another user, interfering with his positive contributions every time he does any, who shows delusions of persecution. Or of a user, seeing trolls in everyone who deals with him, who was indefinitely blocked after less than an hour for repeatedly bad insulting other users. I'd find that ridiculous. Probably you too would, if that user weren't you. Last but not least, I've intervened "today" because I'm on IvanScrooge98's side, I have nothing personal against you, the one thing I'd like you to do is stop this stalking, that you started in "July". "Today" vs. "2 months". It's clear enough who's actually stalking and who's just denouncing stalking. So please don't try turning this around again, I started talking about your stalking at IvanScrooge98's expense, you've continuously tried changing the subject by turning it against me. Don't try denying that the fact you've edited a number of articles you'd never edited before short after IvanScrooge98's edit, or that you've suddently become an expert in Swedish phonology, is just a coincidence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.56.95.155 (talk) 21:59, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
You're a funny guy. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 23:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

And you aren't going to stop your stalking despite all I've said so far, I bet.

ARE YOU STILL GOING ON WITH YOUR STALKING?!

Alright, since I am directly concerned here, can someone show me what are the old edits you mentioned?   イヴァンスクルージ九十八(会話)  16:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
@IvanScrooge98: This guy is concern trolling (I think that's the correct term). Plus, in the very first edit he pretended to be you in the edit summary. Don't take this nonsense seriously. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 16:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I see what you are talking about. Yes, I have noticed he has been checking my later contributions, but I think that is because my edits have sometimes not been that excellent; no worries! In any case, there are a few anons (maybe always the same person?) who actually and persistently undo edits of mine all of us would agree on, and I have to verify everything is right in those articles from time to time. (this has nothing to do here but: great, my notifications seem not to work despite preferences, duh.)   イヴァンスクルージ九十八(会話)  17:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply