Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, 98.20.249.155. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Trains2050 (talk) 10:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

I started writing a response that disappeared. I had started to say that over the 20 years in which I've been writing and speaking on this NetWeaving concept, a number of newspaper and magazine articles have been written about it by journalists. The very first was appeared in the Atlanta Business Chronicle, October 15, 2001 my Jim Molis, Assoc. Editor. A number of other articles have appeared in financial services publications including one in Borsen - the WSJ of Denmark - Feb. 24, 2006. If it would help I could send a list of various articles and where they appeared. Frankly, I'm disappointed in Wikipeia's response as it relates to why I would like the word to appear. I have no commercial interest since I turned the website into a totally free resource center, especially for college students getting ready to enter the business world. NetWeaving has also been proven to be one of the best ways for persons in a job-seeking role to land a job in a way that really fits their 'give in order to receive' personality. I thoought the primary role of Wikipedia was to inform persons about words, concepts, ideas, etc. that can value to their lives. In my opinion, so long as it isn't to commercially profit, that's what it should be.