![]() | Attention:
This WHOIS report. . In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in theIf you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time. If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log). |
October 2009
edit{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 17:05, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
98.100.198.100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is a gross example of corrupt administrators abusing their power to discourage anonymous editing. Just because I edit quickly means I'm a bot now?! WTF?! If you unblock me, I promise to edit slower, so idiot admins don't mistake me for a bot again.
Decline reason:
- 1: Abusive request. #2: Edit history full of enough silly vandalism that bot accusation is moot. Good day. -- Daniel Case (talk) 17:53, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
November 2010
editWelcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Bubonic plague has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 00:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
October 2011
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maiden's Tower. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) 19:13, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
October 2011
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maiden's Tower. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sparthorse (talk) 19:13, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
DDOT Route List
editThank you for your help with the DDOT route list. Anything else you feel that you can do with the page to make it more consistent with other transit pages and less cluttered would also be greatly appreciated. Thanks, again! --Criticalthinker (talk) 02:01, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
December 2012
editHello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Leopard cat because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 22:50, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
May 2013
editHello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to United States home front during World War II because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Gilliam (talk) 21:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United States home front during World War II with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. WadeSimMiser (talk) 21:42, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to United States home front during World War II with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk) 21:46, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
February 2014
editPlease refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Voltage , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
December 2015
editHello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Bless Me, Ultima with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 22:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
April 2016
editHello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Fun Dip has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 21:42, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Urban history, you may be blocked from editing. —SMALLJIM 21:53, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Potawatomi. Kleuske (talk) 20:53, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
February 2017
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Charming (Sons of Anarchy). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Gorthian (talk) 22:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tronic, you may be blocked from editing. — Gorthian (talk) 23:13, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gaston (song). ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
March 2019
editHello, I'm DatGuy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Chadwick Boseman— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Dat GuyTalkContribs 22:36, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Socioeconomic status and mental health. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — KB3035583talk 22:45, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
January 2020
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tornado myths has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tornado myths was changed by 98.100.198.100 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907983 on 2020-01-22T22:38:57+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:39, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |