User talk:97198/Archive 8

Latest comment: 8 years ago by 97198 in topic Season's Greetings

Your GA nomination of Bad Words (film) edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bad Words (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 20:01, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Bad Words (film) edit

The article Bad Words (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bad Words (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 20:21, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Begin Again (film) edit

The article Begin Again (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Begin Again (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sock -- Sock (talk) 19:21, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2015 launch newsletter edit

 

Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name here. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised here.

Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs)
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Miyagawa (talk) 20:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Bad Words (film) edit

The article Bad Words (film) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Bad Words (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 03:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

IdeaLab proposal edit

There is a proposal at the IdeaLab that may interest you. Lightbreather (talk) 19:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Big Girls Don't Cry (book) edit

The article Big Girls Don't Cry (book) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Big Girls Don't Cry (book) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 23:21, 13 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Test Kaffeeklatsch area for women-only edit

Since WikiProject Women as proposed at the IdeaLab may take some time to realize, and based on a discussion on the proposal's talk page, I have started a test Kaffeeklatsch area for women only (cisgender or trans-woman, regardless of sexual orientation).

It is a place where women can go and be sure they'll be able to participate in discussions without being dominated by men's advice, criticism, and explanations. If interested, your participation would be most welcome. Lightbreather (talk) 23:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Hans Rosenfeldt edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of John Gilroy (film editor) edit

  Hello! Your submission of John Gilroy (film editor) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Edwardx (talk) 09:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK image question edit

Hi,

I saw you moved Template:Did you know nominations/Interference Archive to prep6. I don't feel like I have a great grasp of what determines which among the hooks is the one displayed with an image. Is there a discussion thread somewhere? Thanks --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Rhododendrites, as you'll see on the main page, every set of eight DYK hooks has only one picture, which means only 1 in 8 promoted hooks runs with a picture. Since the proportion of nominations with pictures is much higher than that, some of them have to run without pictures. It's basically a judgment call when it comes to choosing which hooks should take the top "pictured" spot. There isn't a hard-and-fast rule for choosing them but personally, I try to choose hooks where the picture looks especially good at a small size and the picture is of the bolded topic itself. The hook/article you mentioned has a great picture but I didn't promote it because it isn't very clear at the size of a thumbnail. Hope that helps! 97198 (talk) 02:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ok thanks for explaining. If I were comparing the one selected and the one I added, I would've probably picked the other one, too :) I just didn't know how that decision was made. It's unusual to have a relatively high-visibility selection process occur sans collaboration on Wikipedia, so I figured I must be missing something. So it's basically on the person who promotes it and assembles some hooks in a given prep area? --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
I agree with you that it's an unusual process given how things generally work on Wikipedia. It's basically the decision of the person who assembles the prep area, but it's by no means definitive or final – other users are free to (and frequently do) switch hooks around in the prep areas and there are often discussions raised at WT:DYK when someone disagrees with the way a prep has been assembled. 97198 (talk) 03:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Instinct (Orphan Black) edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Instinct (Orphan Black) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 12:41, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

A Dobos torte for you! edit

  7&6=thirteen () has given you a Dobos Torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.


To give a Dobos Torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen () 09:13, 14 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Lucy Alibar edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:22, 14 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK edit

  Hello! Your submission of Anne Rosellini at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Philafrenzy (talk) 19:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Masanobu Takayanagi edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:06, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Instinct (Orphan Black) edit

The article Instinct (Orphan Black) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Instinct (Orphan Black) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 13:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Anne Rosellini edit

Allen3 talk 01:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK question edit

Hey, I notice that you promoted the German Concentration Camps Factual Survey article to the prep area, and I was wondering: is it too late (or desirable) to add a photo of Alfred Hitchcock? There is one in the article that can be used. tx, Coretheapple (talk) 17:27, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Coretheapple: Hi, and well done on writing a very interesting article. The hook has now been moved to a queue (at T:DYK/Q) meaning that it has been approved by an admin and deemed ready to go on the front page. It's basically past the point where hooks can be edited and rearranged, unless you call for an admin's attention at WT:DYK and ask them to change it. Hope that helps. 97198 (talk) 23:28, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Oh no problem. We'll just let it proceed. Thanks very much! Coretheapple (talk) 02:46, 21 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Bruna Papandrea edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 21 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Instinct (Orphan Black) edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 21 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Adam Arkapaw edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:02, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Presentation proposal for Wikimania 2015 edit

  How to pick up more women...
Hello to the members of WikiProject Women writers! Victuallers and I have developed a proposal for a talk to be presented at Wikimania 2015. It's titled, How to pick up more women -- as in more women editors and more women's biographies. The proposal review process has begun and there's no guarantee that this proposal will be accepted. That's where you come in. Please review our proposal and give us feedback. Ultimately, we hope you add your name to the signup at the bottom of the proposal which signifies you're interested in the talk (it does not signify you'll be attending the event). Thank you! Rosiestep (talk) 22:00, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Eric Gautier edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:01, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sierra Leone at the 2004 Summer Olympics DYK edit

Thanks for promoting the Sierra Leone at the 2004 Summer Olympics DYK. However, I think that the hook that Relentlessly suggested is better than my one. Can you replace it? Thanks. good888 (talk) 09:46, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Good888: I must not have seen the alt hook when I was promoting it. I agree with you, and I've changed it now. :) 97198 (talk) 10:00, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Melanie Oliver edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for John Gilroy (film editor) edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of John Guleserian edit

  Hello! Your submission of John Guleserian at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cambalachero (talk) 14:50, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Teddy Schwarzman edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Benoît Debie edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:07, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Mary Loveless edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter edit

 
One of several of Godot13's quality submissions during round 1

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader   Freikorp (submissions) owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as   Godot13 (submissions) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge,   Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.

In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:

You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email)

Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Eleanor Winthrop Young edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:03, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Template:Did you know nominations/Eliza Ann Grier edit

Hello,

I have reviewed and approved the above. Congratulations and kudos on your research into this obscure nook of American history.

Georgejdorner (talk) 16:39, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Georgejdorner: Thanks, and kudos to you too for all your work on articles about the Laotian Civil War, which I knew nothing about before reading some of your work! 97198 (talk) 10:43, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for John Guleserian edit

Harrias talk 17:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Lisa Bruce edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 09:57, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Elvy Kalep edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 22:42, 5 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Eliza Ann Grier edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Rachel Morrison edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:42, 7 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Margaret Allen edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 11:56, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Constance Ellis edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

St. Patrick's Day edit

Thank you for promoting Ilse Thiele to the lead position of prep 2, - I like to see her pictured! - However, see Women in prep on the DYKTALK: that position was claimed for an Irish singer, to honour St. Patrick's Day. Also: the last women from the GDR is "on" right now, - might be a bit close. Please shuffle ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:15, 14 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Gerda Arendt: Thanks for letting me know – I always find the timing of the queues/preps a little confusing. I have moved Ilse Thiele to prep 4 and replaced her with Margaret Kennedy. 97198 (talk) 11:47, 14 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! It is confusing, especially because update day and archive day are not the same for half of the sets ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Pippa Cross edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 14 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Cora Smith Eaton edit

  Hello! Your submission of Cora Smith Eaton at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 11:38, 15 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Quinceañera (film) edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Sarah Marquis edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:01, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Genevieve Grotjan Feinstein edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sophie, you are great! not only is the above article great, but I cant believe how many DYK articles youve been involved in per your userbox! -I am ignorant as to how to do DYK, although my article for Maria Radner was just suggested yesterday for DYK.-- Thank you !--Wuerzele (talk) 17:41, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Wuerzele! Great work on the Maria Radner article – I actually read part of it yesterday after following a link from the Germanwings crash page and was impressed at its quality for a brand new article. The DYK process takes a bit of getting used to, and there are many users who know its ins and outs better than I do, but if you ever have any questions about it I'd be happy to help out. :) 97198 (talk) 11:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Elvy Kalep edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Elvy Kalep you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rosiestep -- Rosiestep (talk) 20:01, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

This was an easy one to review. Congratulations on your newest GA! --Rosiestep (talk) 03:29, 30 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Cora Smith Eaton edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 29 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Elvy Kalep edit

The article Elvy Kalep you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Elvy Kalep for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rosiestep -- Rosiestep (talk) 03:41, 30 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Happy Easter! edit

File:Chocolate-Easter-Bunny.jpg
All the best! "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 01:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Precious again edit

climbers
Thank you, Sophie, for quality articles on film, TV and mountaineering, such as The Go-Getter, List of Dexter episodes, covering mostly people, such as Anna and Ellen Pigeon and Ralf Dujmovits, for "great work ethic and your excellent GA reviews", and for a great simple user page, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:56, 6 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

A year ago, you were the 817th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Danke nochmals, Gerda! 97198 (talk) 14:05, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Solveig von Schoultz edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Boat Race review edit

  The Running Man Barnstar
Hey 97198, just a quick barnstar to say thanks for the review of one of Boat Race articles you conducted over the past year. As of this morning, I completed my (initial) goal of ensuing that every Boat Race had, not only its own article, but one that was either of GA or FA status: we now have 158 GAs and 3 FAs that we can all be proud of! It doesn't stop here, for me at least, I'm going to keep up with improving the quality of the GAs and look for more FA opportunities. Plus, there's the small matter of 70 Women's Boat Race articles to get up and running! But thanks again, I couldn't have done it without your help. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Elvira Dolinar edit

Thanks from the DYK project and I Victuallers (talk) 08:03, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Film cats edit

Hi. Note that all films have the primary cat of by country, per WP:FILMCAT. This is a non-difussing category. If you have any questions, please raise them at WT:FILM. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:44, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Lugnuts: Ah, thanks. From the wording of header of the primary country categories I assumed each article was automatically placed in the primary categories by virtue of being in any subcategory. Will keep that in mind. 97198 (talk) 09:50, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
No problem. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:51, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bryan Nash Gill edit

Hi Sophie-- I see that you did the bulk of the work on Bryan's page. Thank you for that. He was my brother-in-law and a great friend. How do you know his work?

@Jimintheatl: I happened to pick up his book in a Sydney bookshop and thought his prints were beautiful. Googled his name, saw his other work, read a bit about him, and decided to write an article. 97198 (talk) 10:32, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

You might appreciate this. https://vimeo.com/70605265

Another lovely piece of work. Thanks for sharing. 97198 (talk) 14:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Annakarin Svedberg edit

Harrias talk 13:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Ilse Blumenthal-Weiss edit

Harrias talk 21:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Rosina Heikel edit

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:31, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Special request edit

Hi, if you happen to be building prep sets for Preps 3, 4, or 5, would you mind promoting Template:Did you know nominations/A.D. Roy and Template:Did you know nominations/Steeve Briois, per the special request notice on WT:DYK? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 13:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Just promoted both. :) 97198 (talk) 13:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
That was fast! Thanks! Yoninah (talk) 14:10, 26 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

TWL Questia check-in edit

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

  • Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
  • When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
  • Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks!
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2015 May newsletter edit

 
C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy) is a long-period comet discovered on 17 August 2014 by Terry Lovejoy; and is one of several Featured Pictures worked up by   The Herald (submissions) during the second round.

The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was   Cas Liber (submissions) in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus.

Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.

The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) 16:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Vera Lachmann edit

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

TWL Questia check-in edit

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

  • Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
  • When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
  • Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:43, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Reply

DYK for Heinrich Jost edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:15, 17 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Ian Jacobs (academic) edit

Thanks for your article Victuallers (talk) 00:03, 18 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Hedwig Kettler edit

Harrias talk 07:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Clementine Krämer edit

Every article helps - thanks Victuallers (talk) 20:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!

  • What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
  • When? June 2015
  • How can you help?
    1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
    2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
    3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.


Thanks, and happy editing!

User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa

DYK for Laura Forster edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:32, 31 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join us edit

Thanks for your work on Rectovestibular fistula. If you're interested in medicine-related articles, then please put WT:MED on your watchlist. WikiProject Medicine is pretty active and IMO one of the best groups of editors on the entire wiki. You'd be very welcome. WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:06, 6 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

@WhatamIdoing: Thanks. I occasionally drop by the project talk page to have a look at the discussion, but I don't have a lot of experience/confidence in writing about medical topics in Wikipedia's style, so I'm slowly easing myself into it. 97198 (talk) 05:19, 6 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
I'm glad that you've found the group. Feel free to drop in and say hello, or ask questions. I promise that we don't bite good editors very often.   WhatamIdoing (talk) 14:41, 6 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
@WhatamIdoing: Thanks, I'll keep that in mind! 97198 (talk) 15:12, 6 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Adele Schreiber-Krieger edit

The DYK project (nominate) 19:32, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Gayby Baby edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:38, 10 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Rectovestibular fistula edit

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Die Freundschaft edit

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:00, 22 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Lucien von Römer edit

Gatoclass (talk) 14:35, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Harvie Krumpet edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harvie Krumpet you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yashthepunisher -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:00, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Harvie Krumpet edit

The article Harvie Krumpet you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Harvie Krumpet for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yashthepunisher -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:21, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Incomplete DYK nomination edit

  Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Tallulah (film) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 00:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Library needs you! edit

 

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

  • Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
  • Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
  • Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
  • Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
  • Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
  • Research coordinators: run reference services



Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Tallulah (film) edit

Gatoclass (talk) 13:07, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Quinceañera (film) edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Quinceañera (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bobamnertiopsis -- Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 23:00, 26 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Quinceañera (film) edit

The article Quinceañera (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Quinceañera (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bobamnertiopsis -- Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 23:40, 26 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Quinceañera (film) edit

The article Quinceañera (film) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Quinceañera (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bobamnertiopsis -- Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 14:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Mathilde Wurm edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:02, 29 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject Women edit

Hi, I see you recently joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red. I've made a proposal to merge this project into Wikipedia:WikiProject Women at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red, so we can not only cover missing articles but focus on general quality of women's biographies. If interested please put your name down on the WP:Women page at the bottom.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:02, 29 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Paul Schneider-Esleben edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Enough Said (film) edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Enough Said (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 11:01, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Enough Said (film) edit

The article Enough Said (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Enough Said (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:41, 9 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Enough Said (film) edit

The article Enough Said (film) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Enough Said (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:41, 10 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red edit

  Formal merge proposal
There is currently a merge discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red#Formal merge proposal. As you are a member of WiR, this is a courtesy notification in case you want to join in the discussion. Thank you. Rosiestep (talk) 02:26, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Enough Said (film) edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:56, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership edit

You are invited!World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in LeadershipCome and join us remotely!
World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership
Dates: 7 to 20 September 2015
 

The Virtual Edit-a-thon, hosted by Women in Red, will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in Leadership to participate. As it is a two-week event, inexperienced participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in leadership. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and find more details →here←--Ipigott (talk) 08:54, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

You're invited! Smithsonian APA Center & Women in Red virtual edit-a-thon on APA women edit

Asian Pacific American Women World Virtual Edit-a-thon
 
"The Smithsonian APA Center invites you to attend the 2nd annual Wikipedia APA an editathon for cultural presence, which will be held during the month of September 2015. We are thrilled to invite you to Wikipedia APA, an editing event for improving and increasing the presence of cultural, historic, and artistic information on Wikipedia pertaining to Asian Pacific American ("APA") experiences. The second Wikipedia editathon dedicated to APA content, this project will occur as physical events during September 2015... as well as remotely, with participants taking part from all throughout the world."
Did you Know that 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? Not impressed? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you! WiR will be hosting one of this world virtual edit-a-thon. The 3-day event will focus on improving Wikipedia's coverage of Asian Pacific American women and their works (books, paintings, and so on).

--Rosiestep (talk) 03:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2015 September newsletter edit

The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.

In round 3, we had a three-way tie for qualification among the wildcard contestants, so we had 34 competitors. The leader was by far   Casliber (submissions) in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was   Coemgenus (submissions) at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points.

The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:

  1.   Cas Liber (submissions), who is competing in his sixth consecutive Wikicup final, again finished the round in first place, with an impressive 1666 points in Pool B. Casliber writes about the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy. A large bulk of his points this round were bonus points.
  2.   Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points), second place both in Pool B and overall, earned the bulk of his points with FPs, mostly depicting currency.
  3.   Cwmhiraeth (submissions), first in Pool A, came in third. His specialty is natural science articles; in Round 4, he mostly submitted articles about insects and botany. Five out of the six of the GAs he submitted were level-4 vital articles.
  4.   Harrias (submissions), second in Pool A, took fourth overall. He tends to focus on articles about cricket and military history, specifically the 1640s First English Civil War.
  5.   West Virginian (submissions), from Pool A, was our highest-scoring wildcard. West Virginia tends to focus on articles about the history of (what for it!) the U.S. state of West Virginia.
  6.   Rodw (submissions), from Pool A, likes to work on articles about British geography and places. Most of his points this round were earned from two impressive accomplishments: a GT about Scheduled monuments in Somerset and a FT about English Heritage properties in Somerset.
  7.   Rationalobserver (submissions), from Pool B, came in seventh overall. RO earned the majority of her points from GARs and PRs, many of which were earned in the final hours of the round.
  8.   Calvin999 (submissions), also from Pool B, who was competing with RO for the final two spots in the final hours, takes the race for most GARs and PRs—48.

The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.

Good luck to the finalists; the judges are sure that the competition will be fierce!

Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 11:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Five minutes to help make WikiProjects better edit

Hello!

First, on behalf of WikiProject X, thank you for trying out the WikiProject X pilot projects. I would like to get some anonymous feedback from you on your experience using the new WikiProject layout and tools. This way, we will know what we did right, and if we did something horribly wrong, we can try to fix it. This feedback won't be associated with your username, so please be completely honest. We are determined to improve the experience of Wikipedians, and your feedback helps us with that. (You are also welcome to leave non-anonymous feedback at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject X.)

Please complete the survey here. The survey has two parts: the first part asks for your username, while the second part contains the survey questions. These two parts are stored separately, so your username will not be associated with your feedback. There are only nine questions and it should not take very long to complete. Once you complete the survey I will leave a handwritten note on your talk page as a token of my appreciation.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Harej (talk) 17:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Käthe Leichter edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

DYK for Sakaye Shigekawa edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Nina Yang Bongiovi edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Sophia Lin edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for participating edit

DYK for Adventures in Stationery edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • Thanks for expanding the article. I started it after hearing a talk by the author at a Sunday Assembly at the Conway Hall. The talk was about "boring things" in general and you can read more about his ideas on his blog. I deliberately left the body of the article as a one-liner to make it easy to 5x expand at DYK but never got around to doing that step. It's good that you picked it up as the history of the article indicates that there have been attempts to delete the article without telling me. Andrew D. (talk) 12:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • @Andrew Davidson: I picked up a copy of the book a few months ago while I was in London on holiday. I just got around to reading it and thought it deserved a slightly more substantial article. I've had a look at his blog – he seems like an amusing guy! 97198 (talk) 12:47, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Stephanie Langhoff edit

Gatoclass (talk) 17:49, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Eric Steelberg edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:38, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture edit

You are invited! Join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture

 
  • Dates: 15 to 25 October 2015
  • Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event
  • Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR): Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you!
  • Sponsor: Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in association with Beverly Willis Architecture Foundation, Women in Design, and Wikiproject Women Wikipedia Design
  • Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a series of "physical" Guggenheim edit-a-thons. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in architecture and design to participate. The campaign aims to further the goals of Ada Lovelace Day for STEM, and Art+Feminism for art, in a field that by its nature combines both. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over a week and a half, inexperienced participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in this field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome.
  • RSVP and learn more: →here←--Ipigott (talk) 07:34, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

? edit

You just thanked me for making an article on The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows. Any specific reason? :P SilverserenC 20:31, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Silver seren: I'm a longtime fan of the website and I was showing my appreciation that you'd started an article about it. :) 97198 (talk) 05:48, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Elisabeth Holm edit

Gatoclass (talk) 11:37, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Preps 5 and 6 edit

Hi, I've cleared Preps 5 and 6 for hooks from the Special Occasions holding area for October 13 (Ada Lovelace Day). I've promoted all the ones I didn't write or review. Would you be able to promote the rest? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 09:04, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sorry Yoninah, I only just saw your message. It looks like Cwmhiraeth has added a couple of hooks, and I just promoted one more – I couldn't see any other appropriate articles that were ready for promotion. 97198 (talk) 10:13, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks so much! Yoninah (talk) 10:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply


  The 200 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
Hi Sophie from Sydney known as "97198". It is my pleasure to recognise (belatedly) that you have made over 200 contributions to DYK. Impressive to see that you also create GAs... wow. I have seen so many film related hooks and so many women. Some great contributions including the unfortunately named Mary Loveless. No relation of yours I believe. Thanks for your cheerful and helpful contributions to the project. Victuallers (talk) 15:18, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Victuallers: Thank you so much for the kind words. Seeing all of your contributions at DYK made me realise how many women's biographies we are missing and was one of the things that inspired me to get involved in creating more. 97198 (talk) 06:20, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Obvious Child edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Obvious Child you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 21:21, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Smashed (film) edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Smashed (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 03:40, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Obvious Child edit

The article Obvious Child you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Obvious Child for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 03:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Template:Did you know nominations/Eleanore Pettersen edit

Review completed. 7&6=thirteen () 12:24, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@7&6=thirteen: Thanks for the review and for your improvements to the article! 97198 (talk) 12:36, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Smashed (film) edit

The article Smashed (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Smashed (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 17:40, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Mark Heyman edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:46, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Sigrid Lorenzen Rupp edit

Thanks for supporting Wikipedia and the DYK project Victuallers (talk) 13:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Obvious Child has been nominated for Did You Know edit

DYK nomination of Elizabeth Cadbury-Brown edit

  Hello! Your submission of Elizabeth Cadbury-Brown at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Note: this is my first crack at a DYK review, so please excuse any mistakes. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Gertrude Leverkus edit

Thanks for the contribution Victuallers (talk) 00:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Smashed (film) edit

The article Smashed (film) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Smashed (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Judith Edelman edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for participating in Women in architecture edit

DYK for Deborah Saunt edit

Thanks Victuallers (talk) 12:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Eleanore Pettersen edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Kate Macintosh edit

Thanks for helping Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Corinne Bennett edit

Thanks for helping Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Obvious Child edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:01, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science edit

You are invited! Join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

 
 
  • Dates: 8 to 29 November 2015
  • Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event
  • Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR) in collaboration with Women scientists: Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you!
  • Sponsor: New York Academy of Sciences
  • Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a "phyisical" event during the afternoon of Sunday, November 22 in New York City. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in science to participate. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over three weeks, new participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in the field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome.
  • RSVP and learn more: →here←

--Rosiestep (talk) 01:12, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

5 million edit

 
                                                  We've reached five million!!                                                  

The English Wikipedia now has over 5,000,000 articles! Woo-hoo!

Feel free to pass this message on! You can never celebrate too much.  

Eman235/talk 17:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Rosemary Stjernstedt edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Eva Vecsei edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Smashed (film) edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Teresa Borsuk edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

A cup of tea for you! edit

  Hi Sophie! I'm Emily, I don't think we've met, but I wanted to send you some love for all the awesome writing you're doing with women scientists. Thank you so much. We need more people like you! :) See you around the Women in Red edit-a-thon this month! Keilana (talk) 07:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Keilana: Thanks, Emily! I've seen your name around a fair bit but it's nice to meet you. Thanks for everything you've done on the women scientists WikiProject! 97198 (talk) 05:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Monica Pidgeon edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK suggestion edit

97198, since you would know more about this process than me, regarding approved suggestions (mine here) I don't have to follow up on anything right? It's an automatic (and slow lol) process? Lapadite (talk) 10:58, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Lapadite77: No, there's nothing more for you to do except wait for someone to come along and place it in a queue to go on the main page. It is a slow process, especially for nominations with pictures since only 1 in 8 hooks can be run with a picture in the lead slot. Hopefully you won't have to wait too much longer, but let me know if you need any help. 97198 (talk) 11:16, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Ah, ok. No worries. Thanks. Lapadite (talk) 11:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2015: The results edit

 
 
 

WikiCup 2015 is now in the books! Congrats to our finalists and winners, and to everyone who took part in this year's competition.

This year's results were an exact replica of last year's competition. For the second year in a row, the 2015 WikiCup champion is   Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points). All of his points were earned for an impressive 253 featured pictures and their associated bonus points (5060 and 1695, respectively). His entries constituted scans of currency from all over the world and scans of medallions awarded to participants of the U.S. Space program.   Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came in second place; she earned by far the most bonus points (4082), for 4 featured articles, 15 good articles, and 147 DYKs, mostly about in her field of expertise, natural science.   Cas Liber (submissions), a finalist every year since 2010, came in third, with 2379 points.

Our newcomer award, presented to the best-performing new competitor in the WikiCup, goes to   Rationalobserver (submissions). Everyone should be very proud of the work they accomplished. We will announce our other award winners soon.

A full list of our award winners are:

We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2016 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · logs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · logs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · logs) 18:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Award edit

 
Awarded to 97198 for participating in the 2015 WikiCup. Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 18:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Eleanor Cullis-Hill edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Do you mind? I boldly nominated this Victuallers (talk) 10:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply


DYK for Judith Ledeboer edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 10 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Agathe L. van Beverwijk edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Moira Dunbar edit

Thanks for this article Victuallers (talk) 12:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Chika Kuroda edit

Thanks for this article Victuallers (talk) 12:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Mariangela Lisanti edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:01, 21 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Michiyo Tsujimura edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 21 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Kay Tye edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:01, 21 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Writer's Barnstar
For your improvements to What Maisie Knew (film) - thanks Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Ritchie333. :) 97198 (talk) 12:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
I think there's a GA to be had in this article if a bit more work is put into it. Excellent film, struck a very strong chord with me personally as a struggling parent. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I had planned to take it to GA with some more work – after an initial burst of writing after watching (and falling in love with) the film, I sort of forgot about it. 97198 (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Elizabeth Cadbury-Brown edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Kono Yasui edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 26 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Tsuruko Haraguchi edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for participating edit

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Religion edit

You are invited! Join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Religion

 
 
  • Dates: 5 to 15 December 2015
  • Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event
  • Host: Women in Red (WiR): Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you!
  • Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in religion to participate. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome.
  • RSVP and learn more: →here←

--Rosiestep (talk) 05:16, 4 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Patricia Numann edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Hanna von Hoerner edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:02, 5 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Yueh-Lin Loo edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Andrea Ablasser edit

Gatoclass (talk) 12:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Toshiko Yuasa edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Anne Beloff-Chain edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Asian Month Barnstar
Thanks for your great contribution in Wikipedia Asian Month 2015! AddisWang (talk) 14:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your participation edit

--Ipigott (talk) 14:13, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Ruth Schmidt edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Sara Murray Jordan edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Janet Carr edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 21 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2016 is just around the corner... edit

Hello everyone, and we would like to wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2016 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. There are some changes we'd like to announce before the competition begins.

After two years of serving as WikiCup judge, User:Miyagawa has stepped down as judge. He deserves great thanks and recognition for his dedication and hard work, and for providing necessary transition for a new group of judges in last year's Cup. Joining Christine (User:Figureskatingfan) and Jason (User:Sturmvogel 66) is Andrew (User:Godot13), a very successful WikiCup competitor and expert in Featured Pictures; he won the two previous competitions. This is a strong judging team, and we anticipate lots of enjoyment and good work coming from our 2016 competitors.

We would also like to announce one change in how this year's WikiCup will be run. In the spirit of sportsmanship, Godot13 and Cwmhiraeth have chosen to limit their participation. See here for the announcement and a complete explanation of why. They and the judges feel that it will make for a more exciting, enjoyable, and productive competition.

The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. The judges are committed to not repeating the confusion that occurred last year and to ensuring that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Figureskatingfan (talk), and Godot13 (talk).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Greetings edit

 
Season's greetings and all the best in the upcoming New Year! Brandmeistertalk 15:51, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Season's Greetings edit

@Yoninah: Thank you, and all the best to you too! 97198 (talk) 09:12, 25 December 2015 (UTC)Reply