97.112.243.25

November 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —C.Fred (talk) 19:46, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.112.243.25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dude, this is literally ALL to do with wolfboy and jacona. I tried move on and go make constructive edits (IE Mosquitofish) but they were being petty and spiteful 97.112.243.25 (talk) 21:25, 30 November 2022 (UTC) 

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:26, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.112.243.25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand EXACTLY what I've been blocked for, because a few other users were petulant spiteful children. I edit warred on RAS, and we came to an agreement to just call it disputed. I then moved on to make constructive edits to another page (that were approved by C. Fred), which were then reverted on the grounds of 'No source'. So I added a source, and they kept making excuses as to why they were reverting my edits. Did you ever legitimately consider that I'm not the problem? I was just trying to make constructive edits based on sources and sound reasons. This is a LOT of time wasted on everyone's part when I've done nothing but make valid edits. 97.112.243.25 (talk) 22:10, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The stated reason for the block is block evasion, which this request does not address. You must make your request from your original account. 331dot (talk) 22:47, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Three

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.112.243.25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

But I was only ever blocked in the first place due to the aforementioned spiteful users and bias. I made valid cases for all of my edits prior to that. 97.112.243.25 (talk) 22:54, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Closing. 331dot (talk) 23:23, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Talk page access revoked. Another admin can close this last irrelevant appeal out.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:02, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Southland Academy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DVRTed (Talk) 15:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---