96.44.5.219

October 2020

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

96.44.5.219 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was having a quite mild discussion on the talk page of an article after two reverts, something which cannot be reasonably described as edit warring. This seems to be another clear example of WP:Bias. 96.44.5.219 (talk) 01:01, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Having taken a look, it seems like you are indeed edit-warring against the unanimous consensus of everyone else who has expressed a position, and frankly, may be pushing WP:FRINGE (as has been claimed on the article talk page). The fact that you were previously blocked for edit warring and immediately resumed makes it clear this block was appropriate. Yamla (talk) 01:27, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/96.44.5.219).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Newslinger talk 14:00, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 04:06, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

---