September 2024

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

94.54.1.170 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't care if you block my IP but "block evasion" is not what it's for and you know it. I've never been blocked on Wikipedia. I don't care if you believe me or not but that's a fact. 94.54.1.170 (talk) 14:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

That's ridiculous. And this IP is a proxy, anyway. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:14, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Let's be real here

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

94.54.1.170 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

@NinjaRobotPirate No one has claimed this IP wasn't a proxy, that's the whole reason why I don't care if you block it. I didn't use the appeal template to get the IP unblocked, just to get administrator attention. I can understand you guys are jaded from dealing with all kinds of crap, but in this case what I said was actually true: before this block was instituted, I'd never been blocked on Wikipedia. I have no reason to lie about this. You're conflating me with the other person who also doesn't seem to appreciate His WP:OWNerness @SchroCat's nonsense. I found our coincidence amusing, but hardly surprising. "Obvious evasion" was an incorrect ASSumption by @RickinBaltimore and in any case, as we all know, I was blocked for pushing back against SchroCat, not for anything else. What's ridiculous is people claiming otherwise and SchroCat acting like a real tough guy when he's reverting people with condescending comments, but running to his administrator buddies the moment he gets some pushback. WP:OWNers do more harm to Wikipedia than minor harassment incidents. 212.70.106.37 (talk) 06:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. 331dot (talk) 07:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.