94.194.155.125

Welcome

As you will see from below, sometimes the conduct of Wikipedia editors falls far below the standard expected. Here is the evidence of user: Trlovejoy, both edit waring and lying about it after, created discussion pages after the event and generally abusing his position on wikipedia. This is exactly what it wrong with this website.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:94.194.155.125 reported by User:Trlovejoy (Result: ). Thank you. TRL (talk) 20:49, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:57, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:59, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Stop it

If a user wants to remove your comments from their user talk page, they may do so. You cannot force them to keep a warning on their page. You were blocked, the block has expired. An independent administrator was the one who made the block, not Trlovejoy (who isn't even an admin). If you want to contribute constructively to articles do so (or on talk pages, in cases that warrant discussion). But your continued complaining to Trlovejoy is not winning you any sympathy, and isn't going to amount to anything, since the previous block was justified. More importantly, again, though, ist hat it's done. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:27, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Actually, I take it back--you're repeating the same edit warring as before you were blocked, so you will now be reblocked. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for edit warring, as you did at BBC. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Qwyrxian (talk) 01:31, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---