91.140.131.14

Please don't remove the date and month of the year 2000 in the Namecheap page. Because, it's valid. I have checked on the who-is that it was released at 11th of August, 2000. Thank you.

August 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Namecheap, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. jfeise (talk) 15:10, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

No, I want to add the date and month of 200 of when Namecheap domain registrar was established. It's valid. I check on the who-is. Please.

Whois info only shows when the domain name was registered. That has nothing to do with when the company was incorporated. And checking on whois is original research, which is not what Wikipedia does. We need a reliable source. Please read WP:OR. Thank you. jfeise (talk) 16:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

No, I want to add the date and month of 2000 like it was showing in the who-is. When they registered is when they've even been established. So, I really want to edit it again. Please.

Again, please read and understand WP:OR. Provide a reliable source for your proposed change. Whois info is not a reliable source. jfeise (talk) 16:33, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

No, it's valid. I really want to add it in the page. It is real information. Please.

Again, PLEASE read WP:OR. Original Research is not allowed on Wikipedia. Provide a reliable source for your proposed change. Whois is not a reliable source. You saying it is valid doesn't make it so, no matter how often you repeat it. For Wikipedia, we need a reliable source. jfeise (talk) 16:51, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

I really want to add the full released date of when the domain registrar Namecheap became released. Trust me, it is a valid date. Please.

I really want the exact date, month and year to be displayed over the Wikipedia. Trust me, it's valid. I wish that I could provide you my evidence. But, I couldn't. Because, there's no attaching a file. Please.

Wikipedia does not allow Original Research. Unless you can provide a reliable source (not Whois, not your personal opinion, not "you can trust me", not a file or a screenshot) it does not belong on Wikipedia. Provide a reliable source. That's the fundamental thing about Wikipedia. Please read the links here: WP:OR WP:RS. Why are you refusing to read the links? jfeise (talk) 22:17, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

It's a valid information, it doesn't have to do with who-is. But, the date and month that I found it on the who-is is real. Don't remove the information that I edited. For network solutions, here is the link for you to believe me that all the information that I edited in the Wikipedia pages are valid and applicable for Wikipedia. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/united-states-announces-that-it-will-recognize-communist-china Please.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Namecheap. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. jfeise (talk) 22:24, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to GoDaddy. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. jfeise (talk) 22:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

I have chatted with these domain registrars which are godaddy, namecheap and network solutions, I asked them throigh live chat if the date, month and year of these root domains in the who-is search results were established at the same day they registered and they said yes that's 100% true. So, I beg you to let me edit it and keep it like that. Please.

Yes, I have asked an agent over the live chat in namecheap and he/she told me that it was registered at august 11th, 2000 but established at october 15th, 2000. Network solutions was registered at april 27th, 1998 and established at january 1st, 1979. Jomax was established and registered at february 8th, 1997 then changed and establsihed to godaddy at march 2nd, 1999. So, I really want to edit the dates and months in these root domain's wikipedia pages, this is all valid information please.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Again, read up on WP:OR. jfeise (talk) 00:06, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

It is original, not fake, it's all true and it's all not my personal information. I beg you to let me edit to add the date and month of these 3 domain registrars over the Wikipedia pages. Please.

You still haven't read the links provided. Why are you refusing to read that? What part of "Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. The phrase "original research" (OR) is used on Wikipedia to refer to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist" don't you understand? Wikipedia is not your personal playground where you can write what you looked up on whois or called some company hotline about. Please stop violating Wikipedia policies. Thank you. jfeise (talk) 14:10, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

My information is applicable. It's from my own words. I have conatcted the domain registrars and they told me over the live chat. So, I really want to add them to the wikipedia pages. Please.

That very fact makes it Original Research, which is not allowed. Again, you are stating right here that you did the research. That means it IS Original Research, which is not allowed. jfeise (talk) 18:01, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Not really, it's only the established date and month of the year of when they were launched. It's not a long information and it's valid. It's not something very inappropriate as well. Please.

It IS Original Research. It is not allowed on Wikipedia. If you find a Reliable Source it can be added. Stuff from Whois or some chats is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Again, READ the policy rules. The links have been posted. It is really not hard to understand: Read the policies, and understand that no Original Research is not allowed on Wikipedia. No amount of you saying "please" changes that. Original Research is not allowed on Wikipedia. There is really nothing more to say here. jfeise (talk) 18:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Network_Solutions. jfeise (talk) 19:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

There is a help desk question which may explain some of the edits mentioned above.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:13, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

---