86.41.107.246

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.41.107.246 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

In a public café and cannot log on.I would like to discuss some materials onto Michael Collins from my thesis "The Posthumous influence of A Collins Free State"

Decline reason:

This IP is not blocked. Without the complete block message, there is little that we can do to help. SQL^{Query me!} 16:17, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, this is a public café computer and I have some work to do.

I would like to edit some materials onto Michael Collins from my thesis "The Posthumous influence of A Collins Free State"

this IP is not blocked. If you still can't edit, copy the exact message you get when you attempt to do so. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 14:56, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Paul McCartney's Liverpool Oratorio. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Block evasion by Special:Contributions/Emnetinlurve. Binksternet (talk) 14:57, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Binksternet if you wish to disprove yourself a bully, prove it by putting back the Possum interview. It's one interview. You'll be satisified the spamming's finished, and I'll be happy that my piece has been restored. It's a compromise and a win for both. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.41.107.246 (talk • contribs) 23:52, March 10, 2019 (UTC)

My apologies. I misinterpreted your post. It was not an attempt to copy another editor's post and sig. Still, you're blocked for block evasion, so there is no point asking editors to make edits for you or to restore your edits. Meters (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

---