86.2.196.235

July 2018

Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I noticed that in this edit to Sufism, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 14:23, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

If you have an issue with the offered explanation then lets hear it? And thanks for the advertisement for your services but we have no need for them.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Sufism. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. regentspark (comment) 14:31, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sufism. regentspark (comment) 14:47, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sources

Hi. It's not a question of a live link. You need a source that says that says that Tholuck F.A.G. Ssufismus sive Theosophia Persarum pantheistica coined the term and you can't use that book as the source (regardless of the liveness of the link!). Also, the Idries quote should not go in the lead. You can use it elsewhere in the body - assuming it is a noteworthy viewpoint. Please read WP:V and WP:RS to get a sense for what constitutes sourcing. --regentspark (comment) 15:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Apriorism - look it up. Purporting power - interesting.

Repeated Offenses

Hi regentspark, the user (IP address 86.2.196.235) has continued to defy Wikipedia's policies and makes the same edits as seen here [1], [2] and [3]. I think further action should be taken to stop this. Thank you. Dervishistan (talk) 03:16, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

regentspark, new diffs [4], [5], [6]. The user is engaging in a huge edit war on top of non constructive edits. Dervishistan (talk) 04:38, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

I'm reluctant to semiprotect the page because I've edited it. Could you report it to WP:RFPP or WP:AN3? --regentspark (comment) 16:29, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Sufism, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. PohranicniStraze (talk) 00:35, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Passive aggression

That's a very aggressive way of introducing yourself. Almost like you've a mind to dominate.

It's also a bit emotive and miss-representative. I contend that if you read the policy comprehensively you'll find that you are at odds with it.

Also to be editing and offering assistance or services is a bit of conflict of interest don't you think?

Additionally it is of interest that you are repeatedly removing authors and citations that are as legitimate as any other author's on the subject ...

And I'll add to that - why exactly is it that you're changing your 'name' so often, on the run from something?

---