Welcome! edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made to Space Jam. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (86.19.217.161) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! JesseRafe (talk) 19:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 16 August edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sock edit

You're obviously a sock puppet of an already-blocked user. As soon as you're reblocked ALL of your edits will be undone. Bye. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

September 2016 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for evading a previous block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mkdwtalk 19:55, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Welcome! edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Power Rangers (film). I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (86.19.217.161) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:21, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

November 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm NinjaRobotPirate. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:01, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2016 edit

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Power Rangers (film).

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Spirited Away, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Gold (2016 film).

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 22:14, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2017 edit

  Your addition to Smurfs: The Lost Village has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Looking into your edit history and block log, it seems obvious that you're Indigogate (talk · contribs), a user who has had trouble with copyright and disruption before. Since you were blocked for 1 month previously, I've blocked you for 3 months this time. It doesn't seem like you've learned anything. I suggest you wait six months and file a request for an unblock from your main account. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:08, 19 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

April 2017 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=I edited the page for series 10 of Doctor Who, the reason why is because the series has a three-parter and that it's unsourced. ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:52, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

I am using the gise of 86.19.217.161 and have been evading my block evasion though it and I would like to confess my actions because I've had a troubled relationship with Wikipedia over creative difficulties and I apologize for my behavior. NinjaRobotPirate, if you see the unblock in this unregisted user. You'll get to see the consequences of my actions. Bye. P.S, I'm back from my holiday in Bristol and that it's now 2017 so I hope we'll make an agreement that i'll never edit any pages again, promise? Indigogate (talk) 11:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC) Indigogate talk 11:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

You can make an unblock request if you want, but it should be from your main account and address why that account was blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.19.217.161 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I edited the page for series 10 of Doctor Who, the reason why is because the series has a three-parter in it and that the rumor is unsourced. 86.19.217.161 (talk) 07:16, 23 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

As NinjaRobotPirate stated above, the unblock request must be made from the original account. Favonian (talk) 09:05, 23 April 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

border = no edit

Please stop adding "border = no" to infoboxes. You use it indiscriminately and incorrectly. Thanks. — Film Fan 20:49, 17 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Alright Film Fan, i won't do it again. 86.19.217.161 (talk) 06:55, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

I'm pretty sure this wasn't why you were blocked! — Film Fan 16:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

November 2017 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.19.217.161 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What did i do wrong?

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; this is not an unblock request. As to why you are blocked, this is because Indigogate (talk · contribs), a blocked vandal, is operating from this address. Yamla (talk) 14:38, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • For anyone interested, this is a Virgin Media IP in the UK. It's technically dynamic, but Virgin reassigns the same IP address to the same modem/router for every session, so the same user always gets the same IP address - I still have the same Virgin Media 'dynamic' IP address that I've had for more than 2 years. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.19.217.161 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I kept adding border = no to some film pages and one of the users, Film Fan, caught me doing it and told me off for doing so. Because of this, i was blocked for a year for something i didn't do. Can you remove the block please cos i'm obviously Indigogate and my reckless actions got me blocked in the first place so please unblock me so we don't have to deal with this fuss again 86.19.217.161 (talk) 07:02, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Request unblock from your blocked account. Talk page access revoked for duration of block. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

December 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Gladamas. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Bumblebee (film)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 11:48, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:01, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Continued block evasion edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:38, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You cannot edit Wikipedia as long as your main account remains blocked.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:38, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.19.217.161 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I haven’t done anything wrong, I know my main account was blocked years ago because I was trying to something I didn’t do but we need to settle this once and for all.User talk:86.19.217.161 14:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

To settle it, please request unblock while logged in to your main account. 331dot (talk) 18:10, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.