April 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Aircorn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jonas Eriksson (referee) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AIRcorn (talk) 07:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Joseph (Genesis) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:25, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2018 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sergei Polunin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:57, 5 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm OrangeGarfield. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Charlie Elphicke, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! OrangeGarfield (talk) 10:15, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Jair Bolsonaro into Adélio Bispo de Oliveira. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 21:47, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Recent edits to medical articles edit

Hello, I'm not really sure about your recent edits to medical articles ... some of the text you've copied makes no sense outside the original journal articles where it comes from. Please see the medical manual of style and the reliable sourcing guidelines for medical articles. Also, if you have a conflict of interest relating to any of the authors you've cited, you must disclose it. Graham87 (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, your recent edits are OK. Keep in mind the guidelines about technical terminology in medical articles and avoiding the use of the word "recent", though. Graham87 (talk) 06:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply