This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.137.246.226 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

1 Month ban for asking a someone who is behaving like Power Crazed Admin if He is a Power Crazed Admin.... How can this be justified?

Decline reason:

Your 1 month ban is for the total of all your edits, including this one. PhilKnight (talk) 20:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

If you continue making personal attacks you're not going to get an admin to lift your block. Period. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:41, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

This is not a personal attack as it clearly discusses behaviour as opposed to the "individual" so not a personal attack ...


Read the unblock and review the actions that led to a one month block, I think you will be surprised

Read the diff I linked. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

You clearly need to read the blocking rules... 1 month ban for telling someone he worships the devil? seriously is wikipedia now run by the church?

Do us a favour and dont be an idiot.

Do us a favour and don't be offensive for the sake of being offensive. It never works well. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:55, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

September 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Bare Behind Bars— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 23:39, 3 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bare Behind Bars with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:43, 3 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive behaviour. Your behaviour is verging on harassment. Wikipedia prides itself on providing a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. See this bit of childishness. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:19, 5 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian. Sigh. See [1]. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 13:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Talk page access revoked. Keegan (talk) 21:20, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply