Hello 86.129.127.155, please take a look at the suggestions I have made on the talk page for Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, down at the bottom under the heading Discussion of Neutrality, and add your thoughts.

ACM83 (talk) 08:51, 27 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Personal attacks such as this and the edit summary here are not appreciated on Wikipedia. Please read the no personal attacks policy. Orpheus (talk) 06:16, 25 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your saying it was a "personal attack" does not make it so. If you are new to Wikipedia, I suggest you read the Wikipedia Guidelines. You are angry because you tried to insert your personal POV and were rebuffed. Unless you are prepared to make meaningful contributions to Wikipedia, may I suggest that you go elsewhere. Thank you.~~

I'll assume that by removing this comment you've read it and taken it on board. I would also like to draw your attention to a core Wikipedia policy, Wikipedia:Assume good faith. In particular this summation: "If criticism is needed, discuss editors' actions, but avoid accusing others of harmful motives without particularly strong evidence." Your edit summaries accusing others of vandalism are in direct opposition to that policy. Also, your edit summary on your talk page was strange - I added a comment, and you removed it with a summary of "Do not vandalise this page by removing entries". I didn't remove anything - is there a reason for that comment? Orpheus (talk) 01:57, 27 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

3RR

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mohammed Reza Pahlavi. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Orpheus (talk) 08:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

User notice: temporary 3RR block

edit

Regarding reversions[1] made on October 27 2008 to Mohammed Reza Pahlavi

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.
The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley (talk) 21:34, 27 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Comments

edit

Things like this are supposed to be on the talk page and I moved it over. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 15:13, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, 86.129.127.155. You have new messages at Frank's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your recent edits

edit

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Uncited

edit

You've made a number of edits inserted uncited material, e.g. [2]. Please don't. Reply here William M. Connolley (talk) 18:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Blocked WP:NPA

edit
 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

You have been blocked for this post. Please read WP:NPA and avoid such personal attacks/comments in the future. Vsmith (talk) 23:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/81.132.184.14 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Monkey Bounce (talk) 11:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

!!!!!

edit

What is all of this.