83.241.234.4

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Daniel Rooseboom de Vries do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'youtube\.com' (link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tE24ienA0qo) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 13:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

The recent edit you made to Rickard Sjolander constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 13:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC))

May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Jakob Dylan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —TreasuryTag—t—c 17:54, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Jakob Dylan. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Oore (talk) 17:56, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to NASA has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Gail (talk) 21:17, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

Your edits to Cladistics and the related talk page were reverted, because you appear to be the indefinitely-blocked User:Consist. You may not abuse multiple accounts or IPs to evade a block. Further such edits may lead to this IP, or any other IP you use, being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 16:54, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for block evasion, as you appear to be User:Consist. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —C.Fred (talk) 16:48, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

November 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Talk:Clade, you will be blocked from editing. Sockpuppet of banned user Consist Plantsurfer (talk) 17:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for block evasion. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tan | 39 17:07, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Omar Amanat has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 07:50, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Omar Amanat, you may be blocked from editing. Please don't remove content, or add in statements to previously sourced sentences to make the new content appear sourced. Both of those issues, your lack of edit summaries on these obviously controversial edits, and your recent 1 year block, suggest you should perhaps provide sources and explain your edits. Shadowjams (talk) 07:56, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Omar Amanat, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shadowjams (talk) 07:56, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Deleting articles

Please see WP:DELETE for guidance on how to get articles deleted. Blanking them is seen as vandalism and will result in a block if you continue. Thanks, waggers (talk) 08:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Ozi Amanat

Might it be better to follow Wikipedia policy and nominate the article for deletion at WP:AFD? If you just keep blanking it you'll get banned again - whether you're right or not! All the best, Etrigan (talk) 08:14, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

this is turning into an edit war can you both stop reverting eachother and go to the talk page!--Lerdthenerd (talk) 08:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 25RR violated Shadowjams (talk) 08:37, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:48, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Lerdthenerd (talk) 09:00, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

As a result of your continued, inexplicable disruption I have extended your block for another year. Don't come back or it will be immediately ramped up to two further years. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 09:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Referee (professional wrestling) with this edit, has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. For constructive edits, always provide an informative edit summary so that editors have a brief description of your intentions. If you want to try out how editing Wikipedia works, please edit the sandbox page and not encyclopedia articles. If you have questions about editing Wikipedia, you might want to take a look at this tutorial. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tiderolls 01:21, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

83.241.234.4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is the Scandinavian Airlines lounge at London Heathrow Airport Terminal 3... Please unblock this public place.

Decline reason:

Block expired a few months back. Closedmouth (talk) 13:28, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• I also don't see any active autoblock on this account. —C.Fred (talk) 14:13, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

June 2012

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

83.241.234.4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This IP address is for SAS lounge in Helsinki, Finland. Unblock this public IP point.

Decline reason:

Editors with accounts are welcome to edit from this IP; however, there has been too much vandalism to allow it to be used anonymously. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 05:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---