83.240.186.98
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.
![]() |
Welcome!
edit
|
October 2018
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kirsten Vangsness has been reverted.
Your edit here to Kirsten Vangsness was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://ethnicelebs.com/kirsten-vangsness) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:55, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kirsten Vangsness, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. "ethnicelebs.com" isn't a reliable source. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 19:02, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
November 2018
edit Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Kirsten Vangsness have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Kirsten Vangsness was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://ethnicelebs.com/kirsten-vangsness) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:43, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Jake McLaughlin. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:10, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Reese Witherspoon. – Vistadan 16:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Great Britain. Robynthehode (talk) 12:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Order of the Tower and Sword, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 18:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Order of Christ (Portugal). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 18:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Order of Aviz, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 18:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mahmud II. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 13:10, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
edit Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ottoman dynasty into List of sultans of the Ottoman Empire. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:10, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
November 2018
editPlease stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Kirsten Vangsness. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for repeated spamming of "genealogy.com" and similar sites, they are not reliable sources and can not be used as references! - Tom | Thomas.W talk 11:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jane March. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 11:20, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. 331dot (talk) 12:59, 26 November 2018 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. 5 albert square (talk) 20:50, 30 November 2018 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
December 2018
edit Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Franco Maria Malfatti. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.
Your edit here to Franco Maria Malfatti was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://manlioianni.blogspot.it/2011/12/il-ventesimo-anniversario-della-morte.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Franco Maria Malfatti. You have already been blocked twice for it, but still continue to add material sourced to user-generated websites (such as geneanet) and blogs! - Tom | Thomas.W talk 13:59, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Yunshui 雲水 15:40, 7 December 2018 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
January 2019
editPlease do not add or change content, as you did at Thom Barry, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:40, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Josh Blaylock have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Josh Blaylock was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/blaylock_josh) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:16, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Final warning for continuing to add unsourced material on a large number of BLPs, in spite of already having been blocked three times for it... - Tom | Thomas.W talk 19:46, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
editSee Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/G.-M. Cupertino -- PBS (talk) 19:53, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
This account has been blocked for 3 months as a suspected sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. PBS (talk) 21:20, 8 January 2019 (UTC) |
83.240.186.98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm not a sockpuppet. In what do you base yourselves to accuse me of that? 83.240.186.98 (talk) 10:37, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See the link to the sockpuppet investigation above. 331dot (talk) 10:41, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
And?... I've edited some famous or not so much articles other people have, just that? 83.240.186.98 (talk) 10:42, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- See also User talk:87.103.15.190, blocked as a sock yesterday, and my comments showing the cross-wiki extent of their activities. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 11:14, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Another victim of witch hunt!... 83.240.186.98 (talk) 11:38, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
I have now checked all the edits made by this IP address back to when it was first used to edit Wikipedia (14:54, 25 September 2018), Most if not all the edits have been reverted. This exercise uncovered a number of other IP addresses propbably used by the same sock master during this period. -- PBS (talk) 10:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Don't you have better things to do? That User is long gone! You Wikipedians are seriously mentally ill! There is no councelling worth for you! 83.240.186.98 (talk) 11:53, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- PMS, what do I have to do to all those editions, most of which I didn't ever made or I don't even remember what they were, sometimes simply small and or particularly good edits? 83.240.186.98 (talk) 12:25, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
This clown is obsessed with socks!... That's what he must use when the frustrated useful idiots who lives his entire life behind a computer wanks it!... 83.240.186.98 (talk) 14:12, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
editPlease do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Rachel Boston. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 23:46, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tamsin Egerton, you may be blocked from editing. Baden-Paul (talk) 17:18, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Who told you I was block evading anyone?... 83.240.186.98 (talk) 14:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |