82.1.148.215

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Harriet Harman has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Griffinofwales (talk) 20:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

England/U.K.

Hi there, don't change the "country" field in infoboxes if a country is already shown there. The UK is the country of which England is a part. "England" is not appropriate for these fields. Your behaviour (no edit summary, no discussion) so far is indicative of someone who might start an edit war. Don't do this. Thanks, Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:31, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Furthermore, the "in the UK" part that you like to remove exists to help those non-British readers who are not familiar with the make-up of the UK. Don't remove it, thanks. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:35, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Stop it please

Please stop removing "United Kingdom" from the article about Cornwall. If you believe it should be removed please suggest it on the article talk page. DuncanHill (talk) 22:36, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:40, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Trawling my user page for articles I have written, and then applying the same flawed logic to those that you are being warned about already - that's wikistalking - don't do it or we'll take it to admin. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:54, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Editing while logged out

It doesn't hide who you are. DuncanHill (talk) 23:52, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

A discussion concerning you

There is a discussion concerning you on the Administrators' Noticeboard at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:The cows want their milk back. You are welcome to contribute there. DuncanHill (talk) 23:58, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a short time to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Vsmith (talk) 00:44, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Blocked again as a sock puppet of User:FootballPhil. –MuZemike 20:38, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.1.148.215 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This statement is not true. There is no evidence supporting the claim apart from one users superstition. I am very angry that you have made these false accusations. 82.1.148.215 (talk) 21:01, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified as blocked user. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:18, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Talk:Cornwall has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 20:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

---