81.99.69.50

February 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of past Home and Away characters, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. – JuneGloom07 Talk 01:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to List of Neighbours characters, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

I removed two sources that I did not think needed to be there anymore because the character they were referring to is back in the show now and has since reappeared onscreen.81.99.69.50 (talk) 13:44, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to List of Neighbours characters does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! – JuneGloom07 Talk 22:53, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

OK I will from now on.81.99.69.50 (talk) 22:54, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

It seems you have not learned from your mistakes. You have been caught doing this on another article on Wikipedia. Wikihelper678 (talk) 17:41, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Which article are you talking about?81.99.69.50 (talk) 19:14, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal. Do you have any sources do back up? Your content does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. By changing correct information, and not leaving a summary, it transpires that you are only doing this for fun. It is not for the people that try their hardest to gather and update information for this small soap opera. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikihelper678 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Is this about Rownd a Rownd? I did try and put my point across in the talk section of the page but I was ignored.81.99.69.50 (talk) 19:00, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kacey Clarke. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:55, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

There were no sources to back up the parts that I removed. Somebody else should have removed them.81.99.69.50 (talk) 19:00, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Kacey Clarke

Is it relevant, yes? Because it explains her stage name.

Does it need to be sourced? Yes, it does. And six months to find a source is probably long enough.

But if that were sourced, there would be no question that it should remain, IMO. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Well nobody seemed to have found a source yet despite it being flagged.81.99.69.50 (talk) 01:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

---