This IP address resolved to 89.100.94.80.static.monaco.mc as of 10 January 2011, 00:57 (UTC)

Warnings

edit

March 2010

edit

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:33, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

June 2010

edit

Lawyer/bussinessman

edit

See Talk:Giovanni_Di_Stefano_(businessman)#Requested_move, and probably also avvocati.it discussion and european lawyer discussion. --Enric Naval (talk) 10:21, 21 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

December 2010

edit

  Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

I don't know if you have read or not the links I provided above, so I'll make a longer explanation here.

Wikipedia is supposed to use the highest quality and most reliable sources when supporting statements in articles. In places like here (click on the "show" link on the right of the colored part to show the quotes) I provided sources that:

a) quote in several newspapers 'Giovanni di Stefano is not a solicitor, or a registered foreign lawyer, or a registered European lawyer,' says Law Society press and public relations officer Geoffrey Negus." and from the BBC "'He's not a solicitor and he's not a barrister,' says a spokesman. 'As far as we're concerned he has no legal qualifications whatsoever.'"

b) The Argus "A spokesman for The Law Society told The Argus: 'He is not a solicitor. He is not a registered foreign lawyer. He is not registered with the Law Society and neither is he regulated by the Law Society. We have no evidence that Giovanni Di Stefano is entitled to practise in England or Wales.'"

b) cite The Independent reporter saying that he personally checked the Italian lawyer registry in 2005 and that he didn't find GDS listed there (I expanded the quote in that link to include this statement, I had forgotten to include it when I wrote that list back in 2008).

c) From the Guardian "But although Mr di Stefano claims to be a qualified avvocato - an Italian lawyer - he has not provided the UK authorities with evidence, despite repeated requests. If he is not qualified in another EU state then he would not be eligible to practise as a solicitor or barrister in the UK, even on a part-time or occasional basis. (...) A Law Society spokesman said: 'We have been investigating Giovanni di Stefano for a number of months and we have no evidence he is an Italian avvocato, despite having gone to considerable lengths to check this with Italian sources.'

I actually made my part of searching for sources that confirmed or denied his status as lawyer, and this is what turned up in my search. You need to provide your burden of proof to show GDS' qualifications as a lawyer. --Enric Naval (talk) 17:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

High Court case in 2002 finds DS as 'avvocato' that is law and also so much other material and this man practises day in day out you only need do search so please its best no personal issues...we know you are being sued by Italian PM on this and also in USA so if you have personal issues its up to you but this man is lawyer who practises daily. DC79.152.216.46 (talk) 18:26, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

We have already talked about this, haven't we? You interpretation of the 2002 source is a bit off, and later sources in 2004 and 2006 give more information about your status. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:36, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning; the next time you add unsourced content to Wikipedia, as you did at Giovanni Di Stefano (businessman), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Enric Naval (talk) 07:09, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Giovanni Di Stefano (businessman). Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TeapotgeorgeTalk 17:01, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Giovanni Di Stefano (businessman). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② talk 19:23, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2011

edit

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:56, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:28, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 20:47, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

Until you either a. retract the threats of legal action made in this edit or b. the legal action concludes, you are not permitted to edit under Wikipedia policy. Please read the policy if you have any concerns. Thank you, /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 20:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply