March 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Noor Photo Agency, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- Rrburke (talk) 19:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sebastián Liste (May 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by St170e was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
st170etalk 12:56, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! 80.113.2.204, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! st170etalk 12:56, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pep Bonet (May 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bearcat (talk) 22:04, 21 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Sebastián Liste has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sebastián Liste. Thanks! Mduvekot (talk) 18:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sebastián Liste has been accepted edit

 
Sebastián Liste, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mduvekot (talk) 14:39, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Pep Bonet edit

Just for the record, it's not necessarily the case that I have to personally review the draft again once it's resubmitted — for example, the first reviewer doesn't even get any special notification that the draft has been resubmitted. Rather, once it's back in the approval queue again, anybody who reviews articles for that project can take on the second review — just because I'm the one who looked at it the first time doesn't mean I also have to take the lead in reviewing it the second time as well. You're actually better off with multiple different reviewers involved, because the diversity of perspectives on it will help make it a better article overall. Hope that helps a bit. Bearcat (talk) 14:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pep Bonet (June 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 15:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrea Bruce (June 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 06:47, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Andrea Bruce edit

 

Hello, 80.113.2.204. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Andrea Bruce".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 17:59, 14 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Pep Bonet edit

 

Hello, 80.113.2.204. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Pep Bonet".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 00:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply