October 2020 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pol Pot. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — UncleBubba T @ C ) 20:05, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Pol Pot edit

In case you didn't see the note on my Talk page, reply here. Spreading a thread across multiple pages makes an incomprehensible mess.

Two of the refs you posted, Morrock and deVries, seem to cite Short. So with one real source, maybe.

(And if you choose to reply, please do so here.) — UncleBubba T @ C ) 20:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

You quite clearly don't care because otherwise you would not have reverted my edits for being 'unconstructive' without basis. The real source was not enough and clarification was needed so i provided ones that explicitly stated what happened, because calling it "sexual experiences" without that being explicitly stated in the original source is OK but calling it "sexual abuse" isn't. Any reasonable observer would call it what it was - molestation. 79.70.173.20 (talk) 21:06, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply