79.69.243.22

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rochelle Neil (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rochelle Neil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rochelle Neil, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, 79.69.243.22! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Battle of Midway; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 14:18, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at Sinking of the RMS Titanic. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Long-term abuse case that User:Acroterion calls the LTA:UK Kennedy/Lincoln/Titanic IP. Recent activity may be seen at Special:Contributions/86.8.202.128, Special:Contributions/86.8.200.32, Special:Contributions/80.2.20.174, Special:Contributions/80.2.22.35, Special:Contributions/80.2.21.35, Special:Contributions/80.2.21.67, Special:Contributions/80.2.20.163, Special:Contributions/80.2.20.80, Special:Contributions/80.2.20.240, Special:Contributions/217.137.42.127, Special:Contributions/80.2.20.67, Special:Contributions/80.47.46.213 and Special:Contributions/2.97.27.181. Binksternet (talk) 14:46, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rochelle Neil (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rochelle Neil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rochelle Neil, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 14:28, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rochelle Neil

Hello, 79.69.243.22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rochelle Neil".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:04, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

---