Tenerina

edit

If there is flour in the torta tenerina, why do you insist to include it in the article about flourless cakes? 77.205.41.211 (talk) 11:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Are you trolling? Again, there isn't, unless you can show it with any GOOD source 79.21.222.19 (talk) 12:21, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

August 2024

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as done at Flourless chocolate cake.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Hey man im josh (talk) 12:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
That Ip was rapidly reversing and vandalizing the page without adding any source 79.21.222.19 (talk) 12:19, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

79.21.222.19 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Plese unblock me, I tried to reason but this IP was starting an editing war. I tried to reason with him, tried to make he understand he shouldn't change it without consensus but he paid me no mind79.21.222.19 (talk) 12:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This does not justify your violation of WP:EW. Yamla (talk) 12:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But it justify the other IP? How come the page is being modify as we speak?

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

79.21.222.19 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I tried to reason but no administrator came to help resolve the dispute and the article is still changed as we speak. Can some other administrator that is not a total *** review this block? I tried to move in good faith79.21.222.19 (talk) 9:43 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Your actions clearly violated WP:EW. The other editor's actions do not excuse your behavior. And please do not make personal attacks. GoodnightmushTalk 13:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

79.21.222.19 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My action were in a protection of an article you are neglecting to defend. And I did not an attack. He is just unfit as administration 79.21.222.19 (talk) 14:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing personal attacks are not considered. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 14:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

IP and Enamai

edit

Not to mention is the same IP of Xiaomicheal, known for his sockpuppets 79.21.222.19 (talk) 14:21, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

79.21.222.19 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Nor are those without it. Beside, where was the personal attack? I told you the IP is know for his sock puppets 79.21.222.19 (talk) 14:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You no longer seem to be addressing the reason for the block. I suggest you carefully read WP:EDIT WAR. You clearly were edit warring, so the block is correct. PhilKnight (talk) 15:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

79.21.222.19 (talk) 14:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Block evasion

edit

@PhilKnight, @Jpgordon, @Goodnightmush block evasion of this IP:

now here: 79.17.172.126 77.205.68.13 (talk) 16:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
The block has expired. PhilKnight (talk) 16:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Not this one: @95.244.205.15 and it is the same guy, same location and behavior 77.205.68.13 (talk) 16:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply