79.109.203.252

Apparently I am unable to edit my own user page.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

You have made three reverts within 24 hours at the article Crimean Karaites. You need to ensure that you are familiar with the three reverts rule which can be found at WP:3RR. Though not technically guilty of a voilation of the three revert rule (though see next paragraph), this number of reverts is still regarded as being involved in an edit war. (See also WP:BRD.)

You also appear to have made a fourth revert at the same article using an alternate dynamic and proxy IP address 149.254.235.196 (talk · contribs). Since the reversion is the only edit that this IP address has made in over two years,  Looks like a duck to me. You should review the policy at WP:SOCKPUPPETRY.

Finally, you have publically stated at the article talk page that you are a Christian Zionist. You have therefore publically stated that you have a direct connection with the article's subject matter. That is to say: that you have a conflict of interest with preserving the neutrality of the article. Articles on religious subjects attract attention from many editors who have a vested interest in both promoting and denigrating whatever religious topic is under discussion. You should review the policies at WP:COI before engaging further. Basically, you should not directly edit any article in which you have a conflict of interest. If you wish to contribute to the article, you should propose what changes you want made on the talk page using the {{request edit}} template. This flags a proposed edit elsewhere so that others can review your request, and also flags it as a conflict of interest request. Your request must be in the format of "Please change X to Y. Reason: (whatever). Supporting references: (references)." If you can't find reliable and verifiable sources, then I wouldn't bother, as it will only get a  Not done as a response.

While I am not taking sides on this issue, the diatribe that you posted to the talk page is wholly unacceptable because even the caption flagged it as a rant and others will treat it as such as was demonstrated. I am not surprised that it was deleted, though the person deleting had no right to do so.

It is interesting to me to see how everyone who tries to point out the truth about this article is blocked banned mocked and otherwise discriminated against. Very curious indeed. There is obviously some agenda going on here which a group of sockpuppets at wikipedia have managed to encircle. Well it is a pity for the English language audience. Bare in mind that every empire crumbles and your little troop will see its time come. You may have pulled the wool over the eyes of some admin, but you will not be able to fool all of them.

As for the three revert rule, it is only you and your sock-puppets and meat-puppets who have broken that rule. I first reverted the page at 14:34, 19 April 2015‎ and so I am going to place the dispute tag on the page again now. Which by the way has to stay until the dispute has been resolved. So you should learn your revise your policy knowledge on that before you also become counted as a sockpuppet.

If anyone takes your side and edits the page then their integrity is not pulled into question, but it anyone takes the side of OBJECTIVITY like the IP who edited this morning, then you say it is Sockpuppetry. I think those who cry "sockpuppet sockpuppet" all the time are more than likely expert at sockpuppetry themselves. I have already stated that I am willing to prove my identity to official and well known admins. I do not have anything to hide. As soon as one of them contacts me I will oblige. Until then I would appreciate you stop harrassing me. 79.109.203.252 (talk) 17:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

You may wish to reconsider what you have written and strike the allegations that you have made. I stated clearly above that I have no agenda and am not taking sides either for you or against you in the article content, and as far as I am aware I have not. It may be that you could be on the receiving end of the WP:BOOMERANG because I shall have no hesitation in raising a separate, but linked, ANI case, not to mention an SPI case (as you are hell bent on accusing everyone else) should you continue in your current vein. I have merely attempted to point out to you what is required for you to be able to change the content of Crimean Karaites. Whether it is right or wrong (and I neither know nor care), simply continuing to revert your edit based on your ranting diatribe will only result in, at best, the article being semi-protected, and at worst, your being blocked from editing. Either way you will have no further ability to directly edit the article.

I do not have the time to persue this further today, but I will have tomorrow. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 18:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

I have asked you to stop harrassing me. Please do not post here again. 79.109.203.252 (talk) 18:28, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Right, I have had enough of this.

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/79.109.203.252. Thank you.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is IP editor resorting to abuse and malicious allegations against other users.. Thank you.

DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 16:18, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

---