78.183.156.104

Talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, 78.183.156.104. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories.
Message added 21:11, 4 December 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Qwerfjkltalk

Sandbox warnings

Thanks for the concern on articles like Sandbox Theatre, but users never mistake these articles for actual sandboxes, I don't think we need the warnings. Belbury (talk) 11:09, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

OK. 78.183.156.104 (talk) 11:09, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this IP address or network has been used to disrupt Wikipedia. It has been blocked from editing to prevent further abuse.
If you are not the intended target of this block, please read the information below in order to receive assistance.

Wikipedia tries to be open, but we sometimes must block IP addresses to prevent editing by abusers, vandals, or block evaders. These blocks can affect users who have done nothing wrong. If you are a legitimate user, follow the instructions below to edit despite the block. Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block.

IP users (without an account): If you do not have an account and wish to bypass this block, an account can be created to allow you to edit. In general, these blocks only prevent users who are not logged in from editing; once you are logged in, the block will no longer affect you in any way. To request an account, simply click here and follow the directions provided on the page. It is important that you use an e-mail address issued to you by your ISP, school, or organisation, so we may verify that you are a legitimate user. When filling out the account request form, please refer to this block in the "comments" input field. If you've been instructed to request an account via email, please refer to this block in your message.

Registered users (with an account): Please make sure you are logged in to your account. If you are unable to edit while logged in, you may request IP block exemption to bypass blocks unconnected with you that affect your editing. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
--Blablubbs (talk) 11:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

UPDATE: Thanks Blablubbs for misblocking me. It has been the last day from the 3-day block which Yamla extended it to a full week (no joke), and my account was partially compromised, and I promise I will not edit until my block will expire next week or some admin unblocks me. Do not revoke the talk page access. 78.183.156.104 (talk) 11:01, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

78.183.156.104 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The CheckUser logs were compromised. Blablubbs is quite bad and nosy. I will not disrupt again, and try to make useful contribs. Second chance. 78.183.156.104 (talk) 12:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Summarily declined due to personal attack. 331dot (talk) 12:20, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Volkswagen GTI have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:55, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Erroneous correction of "Gol" to "Golf". I am very sorry and reverting it. I do not want a edit war at all, but it was a erroneous correction. I have warned the original vandal which did this. I have requested protection of the page. But you misundertook that revert as v&alism. 78.183.156.104 (talk) 11:56, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

78.183.156.104 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

CheckUser block forced Ponyo to revert all of my edits. I will not vandalize again, and will try to make useful contribs. I promise after the block, I will fix all the reverts which include error fixes, which Ponyo said that it was WP:BANREVERT despite being just constructive. See the BMW XM page, which I added the production commencing and Ponyo reverted it to a revision saying it would commence in late 2022, but User:X750 reverted that knowing the production start. See Template:Opel, which I added the Opel Insignia to discontinued vehicles, but it got readded to current vehicle list by Ponyo. But production of it continues only in China, where it is known as the Buick Regal and not a Opel. See Volkswagen GTI, which there are two Golf GTIs, with one being a "subcompact" produced from 1989 to 1994 (which is actually the Volkswagen Gol GTI), while the REAL Golf GTI is listed below it. See Citroën where Ponyo literally vandalized the page by reverting to a revision containing vandalism. 78.183.156.104 (talk) 11:24, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

 Confirmed, block extended. Nor does this unblock request address the reason for the block in any case. You appear to be deliberately wasting our time. Yamla (talk) 11:26, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You know, I don't think it was particularly appropriate to undo all of their reversions. Sure, they may be a sockpuppet, but some of their contributions were pretty good. Oh well. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 00:37, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Please X750, revert the edits on Citroën to the one before Ponyo (he vandalized the page), Template:Opel (How many decades the Insignia is "produced" more than reality?), and Opel page (No, Ponyo should be de-sysopped) 78.183.156.104 (talk) 15:00, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

The Citroën page is the only one I'm going to fix, unfortunately I am not familiar with the Opel Insignia. I do wish you'd appeal the block on your main account though, you seem like a fairly decent user who I'm sure would be a great contributor given a couple minor behavioural changes. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 06:20, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Agree. I don't have a account. Yamla extended my block from 3 days to 1 week on this unblock request. Ponyo and Yamla sucks really. Hey X750, I am gonna trust you, can you ask an admin for unblock? 78.183.156.104 (talk) 14:47, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Unfortunately, it is not within my capacity nor my role as an editor to ask an admin to unblock you. The instructions posted to your talk page are quite clear, I would advise you to to stop editing on whatever other IP addresses you may edit on too, if that's why you're being pinged for CheckUser. I would also advise you to stop levelling accusations of incompetence towards other editors, you are free to dislike editors but written expression or otherwise on Wikipedia is against standard practice. I hope you can take my recommendations into account, as I value your contributions. Thanks! X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 19:03, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Please, for this, undo all of Ponyo CheckUser reverts. These were approaite, but I have a unblock request below. 78.183.156.104 (talk) 19:30, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

You have access to this talk page solely so you can contest your block, not so you can solicit other editors to edit on your behalf, in violation of WP:EVADE. --Yamla (talk) 14:53, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

I did not have a block evasion. I was erroneously blocked for a CheckUser log. I would be happy when the Vezebel Ponyo gets de-sysopped. See X750's messages and the fact Ponyo reverted all of my edits despite being constructive. Please reduce my block to a 1 day. There was no reason for the block. 78.183.156.104 (talk) 14:56, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Last unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

78.183.156.104 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Do not revoke my talk page access. I used to make constructive edits, but I was false-blocked due to CheckUser logs. Blablubbs and Ponyo should be de-sysopped. Last chance for this. I have to revert the edits which Ponyo reverted for WP:BANREVERT which was for no reason at all. 78.183.156.104 (talk) 19:24, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Too many personal attacks have made you unwelcome. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:38, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Aaaaand it's gone. Shame! X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 20:36, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Block evasion

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

--Yamla (talk) 12:32, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

78.183.156.104 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was not trying to evade blocks. I was sorry but I hope no admin will revert my edits. It haven't even a day. Wikipedia is very bad.

Decline reason:

Ad Yamla says, you should log into your original account and request an unblock there. PhilKnight (talk) 12:51, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

78.183.156.104 (talk) 12:34, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Blocks apply to the person, not just the account. Until the block on your original account is lifted, you (you personally) are not permitted to edit here. Please sign in to your original account and contest your block there. --Yamla (talk) 12:41, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

The original account is User:AudiGuy-1204, which got unfortunately blocked indefinitely without talk page access. I have opened a UTRS appeal on it, and the account is not going to be used anymore. I will add another unblock request after the appeal gets accepted, which sadly didn't. 78.183.156.104 (talk) 14:12, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Revert my own edits

Can User:X750 revert all of Ponyo's reverts? Per WP:BANREVERT, it does NOT mean that edits MUST be reverted just because they were made by a blocked editor like me (obviously helpful changes, such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism, can be allowed to stand). I now think that Ponyo is very like a bot. It violates WP:BANREVERT and reverts EVERY edit including typo fixes and vandalism reverts made by a blocked user. Give high priority to the Opel-related pages. Ponyo is enough sick, reverting to vandalism as well. Ponyo sucks. :( 78.183.156.104 (talk) 12:09, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Asking others to edit on your behalf is a violation of WP:EVADE. --Yamla (talk) 12:20, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

But Ponyo has enough of being a vandal as an admin-cheater. De-sysop and block him. 78.183.156.104 (talk) 12:21, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

@Yamla Yeah I know it is but it was not a wise decision to undo ALL of his edits, there is substantial portion of his edits which are constructive, and yes I know ban revert says you can do it etc etc but I just would've thought some foresight would be useful in this situation... X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 08:38, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

---