77.238.223.222

February 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bézier curve was changed by 77.238.223.222 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872048 on 2013-02-20T16:41:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

January 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 20:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

77.238.223.222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

A 19 yo can block someone who wants to add a royal house's only known contemporary coat of arms, while protecting a nationalist who insists on displaying an unrelated coat of arms instead?! So that's why they call you the fake encyclopedia... LOL 77.238.223.222 (talk) 20:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Firstly, that's not what you're blocked for. Secondly, the admin's age is irrelevant. Thirdly, as we've discussed before, your own source acknowledges this coat of arms as a valid alternative. See WP:DR on how to resolve content disputes on Wikipedia. There's of course also the issue of you adding unreferenced content. If we allowed that, we'd rightly be called a fake encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 21:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

77.238.223.222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What's that - firstly... secondly... thirdly... Sounds like a kindergarten as he's 19 and you're what, 18? As we established, the fake encyclopedia LOL 77.238.223.222 (talk) 22:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 22:35, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---