Sockpuppetry case edit

 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Comraderedoctober for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.


  This user has an alternate account named User:Comraderedoctober.
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for block evasion. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

GBT/C 09:02, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.122.45.99 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Tommy Miles is conducting personal political attacks on anything I edit. Anyone who checks up behind my work will quickly realize I am not on a Vandel raid. I work on what concerns me, but since Tommy Miles is in direct conflict of intrest as a member of another party he should be more concerned with the losses he is suffering rather than my work in growing another party of the expelled from the SP-USA. Also if any other Mod. took the time to go behind my work and see that several other SP-USA members were personally attacking my work than this would be a just form for the public. It is not and I now see why Conserapedia was opened. When it comes to Wikipedia and my IP, I travel and use portable technology so unless Wikipedia wants to block whole coffee shops, libraries, colleges, airports, etc. See the SP-USA of which I was an elected Office has already tried to censor and edit me and has failed for over two years in trying so they are resorting to any and all means including shutting down millions of people, ... I win.

Decline reason:

Pledge to evade block again. — Stwalkerstertalk ] 20:35, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will tell you this, Comrade: If you want your original account unblocked, retract the legal threat you made with this IP address. Per WP:NLT, so long as legal threats are outstanding you are considered banned. -Jéské (v^_^v E pluribus unum) 20:56, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Any known group, in this case another political party, that willfully attacks another to defame has caused their own civil action. It is not a treat but a matter of time for resolutions become a reality. Known persons, from firshand interaction with the SP-USA, member to member, have in fact and publically gone out of the way to erase or alter information. If Wikipedia cannot or will not take action than justice demands it from a third party outside of this source to comply with a ruling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.171.129.239 (talk) 04:44, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to 21 March, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 16:51, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply