User talk:76.117.247.55/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
You're great!
68.39.174.238, keep up the good work!
--sunstar nettalk 23:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Unusual edit
I don't follow this edit Raul654 01:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Your talk page is too long!
Hi 68.39.174.238. Unfortunately, your talk page is too long and some browsers may have difficulty rendering it. I suggest a user will archive this page for you. Thank you. Mete oroid 03:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey there. I'm awesome.
From what I have skimmed, people are asking you to get an account. Because I feel like it, I am asking that you never register. I love you. Chris Griswold (☎ ☓) 07:11, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Dear sir. I have gone to a lot of trouble helping a school who happen to like Wikipedia for references [I don't know why]. I have written and edited some articles for their website and used Wikipedia as a link for them. You claim. They are blatant copyright violations. Not so,belongs to them and me. That you claim to own the copyright to the material implies that you are associated with the institute, which is a clear conflict of interest. No more than I am associated with you. I have done this with my own free time but your objections are noted and since you are the one with a lot of free time trawling websites looking for articles to edit, then maybe you should do it for them. Yours disgusted.
Get an account!
Please get an account! Call it something like 6839.174comcast for example, that way you'll be able to do all the things you can't do as anon, which include:
- File uploads
- Move pages to new names (and revert pagemove vandalism, the scourge of Wikipedia...)
- Participate in Requests for adminship, and articles for deletion
Go ahead, do it soon!! you'll miss out... --sunstar nettalk 15:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Blocking discussion
You may want to comment on this thread on WP:AN where someone has proposed to have you blocked. Even community-banned and Arbcom-banned users get notified of discussions on whether they should be blocked, so I think not doing the same for you would be a tad discourteous. ;) Awyong J. M. Salleh 10:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- This has to be the first time it has ever been suggested someone be blocked to force them to register so they can be nominated for an adminship. Congratulations?--Isotope23 18:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
A well overdue award for the coolest and fun IP who should be needs to be an administrator!, I hereby award 68.39.174.238 with the “Cool Award.” Real96 20:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Apologize for the harassment, per the blocking discussion. You are an excellent editor to this project! Real96 20:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Note: discussion since archived to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive76#Blocking of Good User in Order to Get an Account. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:02, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edits
LOL GOTCHA :D
Anyway, just letting you know that Primetime has been taken care of now. Apologies for your inability to edit the Cplot page. Hope you're staying out of the drama! — Pilotguy go around 05:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
From what I have skimmed, people are asking you to get an account. Because I feel like it, I am asking that you never register. I love you. Chris Griswold (☎☓) 07:11, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm with Chris. I love you 2. Its cool you don't wanna sign in! But since i did I'll sign out too! allie_collegegirl21 03:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
user page recreated and redeleted
Hi - I just thought you might find the deletion log listing for your user page amusing. I'm not sure what the record is for most often deleted page, but I suspect your page is in the running. -- Rick Block (talk) 02:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- The weather in London has been deleted 71 times and now cannot be recreated (see Wikipedia:Protected titles/Deliberate redlinks). Your page has only been deleted 28 times, but unless it's added to the deliberate redlinks page (which seems improbable) will eventually overtake London's weather. -- Rick Block (talk) 04:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Please create an account to continue
Have you created your account yet? 68.111.92.229 19:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Anonymous Contribution
|
The Barnstar of Anonymous Contribution | |
| As a fellow anonymous contributor, I hereby award you, the anonymous contributor(s) hailing from 76.117.247.55, with the Barnstar of Anonymous Contribution, for the unsung and thankless service you have rendered unto Wikipedia, in your countless minor edits and bigger contributions over time. They have made a difference in our community. Cheers! 68.111.92.229 20:46, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
Re: No...
...I haven't. It looks like you went in the other direction ;) 68.39.174.238 23:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- The problem for IPs to become administrators is that IPs change periodically and admin privileges may not transfer from the old IP to the new IP. So it is not possible for you to become a "sysop anon". This is why you must create an account to correct this problem. 68.111.92.229 02:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey, your picture of the Hughes Complex has been nominated for featured picture status. The all-caps references are an inside joke (Mr. Treason was a vandal who once threatened to sue Wikipedia in that particular court). Cheers! bd2412 T 03:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
a — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weather Man (talk • contribs) 14:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Hiya
Hiya, you rock. I'm new, and I respect you Mr 68 39 174 238. --74.53.88.50 10:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Account creation
You should create a new account just in case someone uses this IP or IP range to vandalize. Amos Han Talk 10:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Pale blue dot
Pale blue dot is the name of a photo of planet Earth from deep space, taken because of Carl Sagan and is also the name of one of his books (not his best though). I liked the name so appropriated it as my username. Pale blue dot 20:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Userbox
Per your edit count. Real96 07:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- I am moving the userbox up. Real96 00:23, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
How do you edit semi-protected articles
???? Thanks Caglarkoca 23:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
- I know that registered users can edit semiprotected pages; but without an account, how do you edit them? :)) Caglarkoca 23:16, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- the article mighy not be semi-protected at all 201.39.174.238
I award you a barnstar for being a helpful Wikipedia user.64.230.41.86 00:52, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
WOW!
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| You are incredible. An anonymous editor, one of Wikipedia's best contributors. Props. Cheers, JetLover (Talk) (Sandbox) 22:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC) |
Help me please :'(
You know in the "Users who want <insert your IP adress here> to get an account" section? You know the little counter thingy that tells how many users want you to get an account? Can you tell me how to make my own? Tell me through my talk page pls, or anyone who reads this who knows what I can do, please tell me :(. Wikipeep 494 05:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
What is the point on insisting that people sign their comments if you yourself have nothing other than an IP address to identify yourself. Very hypocritical if you ask me. Cfpresley 18:33, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
what Ou-dis-sun means in By the Waters of Babylon
So that's what Ou-dis-sun means. IMO, however, these links are interpretion that doesn't really belong in the plot summary. It would, of course, be appropriate to explain the words you linked in the Analysis section. --Jtir 19:42, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Alaska Congressional Elections, 2006
The contradiction was that the Democratic and the Republican candidate was listed with exactly the same number of votes. I had some free time now (which I didn't at the time), so I got the right vote numbers and fixed it. Railwayman 21:02, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
The point
...for this? 68.39.174.238 22:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
I deleted that edit because it adds excess to excess, put all that information in a more readable format. If it's so interesting, then try making it more accessible. As it is - you can't really see the picture, the caption reads like a play in a play. Thanks Modernist 02:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC) -- Netsnipe ► 17:46, 20 May 2008 (UTC)