March 2008

edit
 

Hi, the recent edit you made to Babe Carey has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Captain panda 03:08, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

November 2008

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Tabitha Lenox has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ceran →(singsee →scribe) 23:01, 6 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Passions

edit

Hey there, thanks for your contributions, however I am questioning the accuracy of the obscure "facts" you have been adding to various Passions character articles. Any such information likely to be challenged really needs sources. — TAnthonyTalk 06:27, 15 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

December 2008

edit

  Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Gus Aitoro. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You seem to have recently copied text verbatim from SoapCentral.com (http://www.amcpages.com/gl/whoswho/augustus.php) and posted it into the article Gus Aitoro (reverted here), which is a copyright violation and against Wikipedia policy. Please do not continue to do this, and kindly revert any similar edits you may have made, or notify another editor to assist you. Continued violations of this kind will result in your being blocked from editing. Thanks.TAnthonyTalk 06:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have also reverted your copyvio in Marie Horton here (from http://www.soapcentral.com/days/whoswho/marie.php). — TAnthonyTalk 06:38, 15 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
I am also guessing by similar edits and violations that you have also edited as IP User:75.66.34.189, which belongs to the same ISP as this IP address. Please check those contributions for similar copyright violations that need to be corrected, like the additon of SoapCentral material to Carly Snyder (which has just been reverted).— TAnthonyTalk

I am discovering several similar copyright violations in the edit history of both of these IPs; I am assuming in good faith that you were unaware that you were violating policy, but this very serious. Please figure out ASAP which articles to which you have added material from other websites so that this text can be removed.— TAnthonyTalk 07:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Fancy Crane. Cheers. Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab 06:39, 15 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

February 2009

edit
 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- lucasbfr talk 08:10, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2009

edit

Montaj13, I would remind you that you are blocked, not just your username, so your editing under an anonymous IP is forbidden. Let it go.— TAnthonyTalk 05:13, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

May 2009

edit

  The recent edit you made to List of Dynasty episodes has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Your recent additions were lifted verbatim from http://www.tv.com/dynasty/show/138/episode_guide.html.TAnthonyTalk 06:06, 2 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have reverted yet another copyvio since my previous warning, this time lifted from http://www.tv.com/Dynasty/show/138/episode.html?season=1&tag=paginator;1 Forgetting for a moment that you are an indefinitely blocked user editing as an IP, surely you realize that your continuing to violate policy will result in a rangeblock of IP addresses that will prevent you from editing at all from your location.— TAnthonyTalk 04:23, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

AfD nomination of Chancellor Industries

edit
 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Chancellor Industries. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chancellor Industries. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

October 2009

edit

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Titans (TV series). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Copyvio from http://epguides.com/Titans/guide.shtmlTAnthonyTalk 15:48, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Blocked

edit

As you well know, due to repeated inappropriate editing behavior, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia. This means that YOU have been personally blocked, no matter which of your alternate sockpuppet accounts or IP socks (like this one) you use. I understand that not all of your edits are disruptive, but at this point you cannot be trusted not to be disruptive at some point. Please stop editing here. You have never responded via talk page or edit summary to any warnings, but should you have a serious desire to redeem yourself, you might want to make such a request letting the community know you are willing to learn and follow the rules, and request that one of your usernames be unblocked on a probationary basis. If you instead choose to create another sockpuppet account, I suggest you stay away from the articles which have gotten you in trouble and earn the respect of the community. Going back to one of the Dynasty articles and making the same edits will only result in yet another block. Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk 00:28, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

November 2009

edit

  Your addition to List of The Colbys episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You have been warned REPEATEDLY at your various sockpuppets and IP socks about introducing copyrighted material to Wikipedia, as you just did by copying material from http://www.ultimatedynasty.net/colbys/season2co.html and adding it to List of The Colbys episodes here. PLEASE stop doing this.— TAnthonyTalk 00:33, 24 November 2009 (UTC)TAnthonyTalk 00:33, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.