73.160.116.196

May 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Ludwig von Mises. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 01:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Jeremy R. Haft seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:12, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Oshwah. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 03:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2017

Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ron Guidry— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jusdafax 00:52, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Dana Rohrabacher— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:41, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Barney Barnato has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Barney Barnato was changed by 73.160.116.196 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892871 on 2017-09-09T03:23:31+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:23, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Henry Northcote, 1st Baron Northcote, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. timawesomeness ⟨talk⟩ 03:45, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did with this edit to Chen Feng (businessman). Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 00:55, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bamboozled. Jim1138 (talk) 01:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Please read

Wikipedia has a policy of wp:No original research. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original content. All information must be available on wp:reliable sources per wp:verifiability. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 02:48, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

---