72.76.95.136

SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIOR!

September 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Arius—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 16:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2021

Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kaikhosru Shapurji Sorabji have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 02:06, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Manganese, Minnesota. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 02:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Tbhotch, you may be blocked from editing. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 02:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Antandrus (talk) 02:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Szymanowski: Violin Concerto No. 1, you may be blocked from editing. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please forgive me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

72.76.95.136 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Jeez, why is it one year? Maybe reduce it to one month? I wasn't intentionally trying to disrupt, I just thought a page was legitimately not notable enough for Wikipedia. Well, now I know that's wrong, and I am aware that if I want to delete a page the right way, I need to submit a notice at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. I'll learn my lesson and swear off unconstructive editing. If I'm not sure what to do/am in doubt, I'll ask someone more seasoned than do it myself and risk disruption. Thanks.

Decline reason:

Given the history of disruptive editing stretching back to 2020, I see no problem with the length of the block here. Yamla (talk) 20:38, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:ToBeFree User:LuK3

Response

User:Yamla None of the edits before July 2021 were by me. Also, ever since my original block in October I have not committed any vandalism/disruptive vandalism, and have remained careful about this. My intention with making the recent edit about Szymanowski was misunderstood; I wanted to improve the encyclopedia and not ruin it with useless articles.

I've read up on Wikipedia guidelines and am willing to abide by them. I have registered for one account in the past (unused), and technically I could use it if I wanted to, but that would be considered evasion which is strictly forbidden, so I will be a good sport and refrain from utilizing it.

I no longer edit maliciously; I have reformed. As such, the jump from 48 hours to 1 year was rather jarring to say the least. 72.76.95.136 (talk) 20:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

If there's a different person who has used the IP address before July 2021, you've done a good job at copying their behavior at least. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:49, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Would this Wikipedia screenshot be a good articles for deletion submission? 72.76.95.136 (talk) 20:55, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

I think we have a deal: Half the block time, but without further trolling on this page here. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:56, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:57, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

---