716arvin

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, 716arvin! Thank you for your contributions. I am CNMall41 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! CNMall41 (talk) 05:50, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gregory W. Cappelli

The article Gregory W. Cappelli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article with a POV-slant and insufficient sourcing for notability. Most of the sources are affiliated or databases; the ones that aren't - Phoenix Business Journal is just local coverage, the Chief Executive Magazine item turns out to be a brief quote of the Phoenix Business Journal in providing a link to it. The only source that points to notability is CBS Money Watch - and that source is used in a way that strips its central point that subject is a CEO in a risky position on a company facing trouble.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 16:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mark J. Brenner

The article Mark J. Brenner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sign here of meeting WP:NBIO - it's sourced to his own writing, affiliated sources, or a couple of single mentions in articles on the Sallie Mae suit.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 17:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Mark J. Brenner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark J. Brenner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark J. Brenner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nat Gertler (talk) 21:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

userfying

Hey, thanks for your careful consideration on the one article and request to have it userfied. Should you perhaps consider the same for Gregory W. Cappelli? That article is a bit closer to solid ground, but just due to the CBS Market Watch segment, which doesn't get us all the way to our notability requirements. --Nat Gertler (talk) 19:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Gregory W. Cappelli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gregory W. Cappelli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory W. Cappelli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nat Gertler (talk) 21:29, 19 April 2016 (UTC)