71.17.56.235

December 2022

Hello, I'm Vaco98. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Vaco98 (talk) 16:19, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tommy Tallarico, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. aboideau^{talk to me!} 16:32, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sorry

I didn't see that the stuff on tomboy was nonsense. I've removed it accordingly. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 02:11, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Very cool of you to delete the chat log, my guy. 71.17.56.235 (talk) 02:37, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

I'm a girl, but I did so to remove your "final warning" status. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 02:41, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tomboy have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tomboy was changed by 71.17.56.235 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952811 on 2022-12-21T02:36:01+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:36, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.17.56.235 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm absolutely fascinated to better understand on what grounds Wikipedia feels removing the storybook of a section you had arguing that "Tomboys are White Supremacists born of Eugenics because their physically fit bodies will give birth to white children more effectively" is "Abusive editing" :Please. Expand upon your logic. Bans don't last forever, article locks don't last forever, and I'm going to keep editing this one mocking Wikipedia until I get an expanded explanation on that front. 71.17.56.235 (talk) 03:16, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per below. Also, essentially identical requests in triplicate removed. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:23, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A quick look suggests that the content you were trying to remove was not encyclopedic in nature. That being said, there's a right way and a wrong way to make your point. This and this are not constructive. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:15, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

"Boo hoo, you were a bit mean about pointing out how flagrantly racist and nonsensical our article was. Boo hoo. There's a right way and a wrong way to point out we've had a standing article state "Tomboys are white supremacists because their physically fit bodies can give birth easier" for at least weeks.

PorterRomanov in the articles Talk Page pointed out this vile, flagrantly racist and misogynistic mumbo jumbo a week ago, and you ignored it.

You noticed me in about 30 seconds. 71.17.56.235 (talk) 03:18, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Yes, I noticed you because I'm an administrator and monitor unblock requests. Crazy, I know? Given your block evasion, I'm declining your requests and revoking your talk page access for the duration of your block per WP:BATTLEGROUND (given your continued disruption) and WP:COMPETENCE (given your inability to recognize when other editors are actually agreeing with you and choosing to dig the hole deeper instead). --Kinu ^t/_c 03:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Lol. I'm back. 71.17.56.235 (talk) 03:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Tomboy—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 02:58, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

My man, that article was about how women playing sports was a product of White Supremacy for like, 5 years before I forced the Mods' hands. 71.17.56.235 (talk) 03:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tomboy. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:03, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

They are not vandalism. They are a reversion to the previous state of this article which rightly acknowledged the not at all nonsensical white supremacist origins of Tomboys. You see, their virile, athletic white bodies (This 100% isn't a weird fetish of the source material of 50% of this article) are better equipped to birth many white children.

Thus we must never forget the White Supremacist Origins of Tomboys, and this article wasn't 100% batshit insane before I trolled it enough to force the Mods' hand. 71.17.56.235 (talk) 03:05, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Tomboy. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:09, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

My man, this was sourced. All I am doing is restoring the original state of the article prior to my previous round of tomfoolery. 71.17.56.235 (talk) 03:10, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

It's not sourced. You can't just say something like that without sourcing it. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

It's absolutely sourced. It was an entire section of this article prior to my trolling Wikipedia into allowing it to be removed (See - The chat log associated with my IP address)

You people were hosting some batshit insane, Eugenics sounding shit, about how Tomboys "Have athletic, virile white bodies, allowing them to produce more physically fit white children; thus the roots of Tomboyism are in White Supremacist Patriarchy" until I teased Wikipedia so hard you were forced to remove it.

All I am doing is restoring the original fullness of the utterly batshit source material this article is built upon. 71.17.56.235 (talk) 03:15, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tomboy. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

My man, as I have said several times, none of this is unsourced. I am simply restoring the article to it's further state.

You guys were hosting some utterly insane, eugenics sounding nonsense about how Tomboys have "Virile athletic bodies more capable of bearing multiple white children" until I trolled Wikipedia into permanently removing it. 71.17.56.235 (talk) 03:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Kinu ^t/_c 03:17, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

---