71.127.182.5

December 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ryan Creamer—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:44, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

What you mean? 71.127.182.5 (talk) 15:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Are you here to make an encyclopedia? Wikipedia is not for fun and games.

Please stop your unconstuctive editing. It appears that you may not understand how Wikipedia works. Below are some links to pages you should read, because while "anyone can edit" Wikipedia, your edits are not good, making much work for other editors who revert them. Read the pages, and if you want to continue editing Wikipedia, make sure you edit according to what those pages say. Thanks.

Hello, 71.127.182.5, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Quisqualis (talk) 19:37, 22 December 2020 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

--Quisqualis (talk) 19:37, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

I do not know what you mean 71.127.182.5 (talk) 15:03, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

What I meant was slow down, read the instructions I posted above, read the edit summary when you are reverted, and prepare to be blocked for vandalism. This edit is absolutely clueless; you added "Siberpoo" to a note asking people not to make up breed names, so slow down and absorb feedback! You have created a sh!tload of work for other editors to clean up your reckless editing. "Anyone can edit", but Wikipedia will not allow incompetent editing to go on for long.--Quisqualis (talk) 15:58, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Siberpoo is a real breed. 71.127.182.5 (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Not the point. You don't seem to understand what you did. Please go back and look at your edit closely and carefully. You added a neololgism breed name to an invisible note asking everyone not to use such unfamiliar breed terminology. As I said, you tend to edit impulsively. Wikipedia my not be the place for you. Wikipedia isn't about what you happen to know, it's about what you can find and cite from reliable, published sources. The fact that other editors are reverting you is not a sign that you should "play harder". Just use all your attention when you edit, and read some of the rules, as it's pretty clear that you have chosen not to do so yet.--Quisqualis (talk) 23:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, or expect to be blocked

You haven't made a single constructive edit yet.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. --Quisqualis (talk) 19:45, 22 December 2020 (UTC) What page was an unconstructive edit? 71.127.182.5 (talk) 15:04, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

I have not made an unconstructive edit! Show me one article I vandalized.:71.127.182.5 (talk) 15:00, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

this may have been made in good faith, but it qualifies as vandalism, as it's devoid of utility and created work for others. It's unclear what good you were trying to do. Please read Competence is required.--Quisqualis (talk) 23:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Do not link draft articles to mainspace articles. Materialscientist (talk) 15:11, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

IP editor, ↑here is the edit↑ where you linked to your draft.--Quisqualis (talk) 23:47, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

22 article edits, 21 reverted. You haven't helped Wikipedia to improve

Here is your editing history, 71.127.182.5. You can observe that 20 of your edits to articles say "reverted", and one I had to undo by hand. This edit did not get reverted. What does that tell you? Since early October, you have been investing your time to make edits which others have to take their own time to fix. Does that tell you something?--Quisqualis (talk) 00:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Diary of a wimpy kid (Online)

Hello, 71.127.182.5. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Diary of a wimpy kid (Online), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

---