December 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to User talk:Onorem has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. WAYNESLAM 22:18, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fenwick High School (Oak Park, Illinois)

edit

Are you really trying to tell us that all of those images of this school that you uploaded are really your own work? You do understand that scanning an image or grabbing a copy off the web does not make it your work? The book cover is for a book that was published in 1999 by someone who graduated in 1934. Are you really more than 100 years old? Similarly the postcards from the 1920s is unlikely to be your own work. Possibly we may be able to use such images, but not if they are incorrectly licensed, as they appear to be. Meters (talk) 06:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

High school secret societies

edit

Hi there, though your contributions at High school secret societies are appreciated, the bulk of them[1][2] are unsourced. Unsourced content doesn't do much to help readers verify the info they are reading, and your additions are subject to removal. We also can't rely on editors' personal opinions, observations or experiences, as none of these can be verified. If you can add some references, that would be very helpful. Please see Referencing for Beginners if you are not sure how to do that. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

October 2019

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Fenwick High School (Oak Park, Illinois), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Additionally, see WP:BRD, WP:OWN and WP:EW. John from Idegon (talk) 21:43, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Fenwick High School (Oak Park, Illinois). John from Idegon (talk) 18:43, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Gaelan 💬✏️ 18:50, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.