December 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Chlod. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to People of Walmart have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Chlod (talk | contribs) 03:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm RA0808. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Bowie knife—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. RA0808 talkcontribs 01:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bowie knife. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RA0808 talkcontribs 01:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bowie knife, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Bowie knife was changed by 69.85.242.5 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.901917 on 2020-09-02T01:47:37+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ra's al Ghul. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 05:12, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2021

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel 8. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 12:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Sirdog. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Operation Rolling Thunder—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. —Sirdog (talk) 01:23, 8 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

December 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Rinbro. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mapp v. Ohio without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rinbro (talk) 06:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The King's Singers, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:48, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Skynxnex. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to David Livingstone have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Skynxnex (talk) 04:20, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 04:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Skibidi Toilet—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 03:24, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: CoinHub Media (October 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gene93k were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
• Gene93k (talk) 03:17, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: CoinHub Media (October 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 69.85.242.5! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply