To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Comments: Blocked for 1 year.

June 2017 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (1974 film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Old JacobiteThe '45 01:23, 1 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I don't care because the plot section repeated the "The Mayor agrees to pay the ransom" twice as well as a few minor edit errors and yet you still act like you own the article and the whole website in general. 69.116.155.79 (talk) 23:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (1974 film).

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. The Old JacobiteThe '45 23:51, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. The Old JacobiteThe '45 23:51, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. —LRG5784 (talk · contribs · email) 16:17, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 5 (New York City Subway service). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 16:28, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, 69.116.155.79. You have new messages at LRG5784's talk page.
Message added 21:09, 24 June 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

331dot (talk) 21:09, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. —LRG5784 (talk · contribs · email) 22:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:LRG5784, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 10:08, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

As for "two little insults"; be aware that any amount of insults is not permitted. 331dot (talk) 10:10, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Blah blah blah. Yawn. Moving on. Like I care. 69.116.155.79 (talk) 10:13, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at User talk:LRG5784. 331dot (talk) 13:08, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

I've reported this activity. LRG has made it clear they don't wish to communicate with you. 331dot (talk) 13:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Okay, snitch. 69.116.155.79 (talk) 13:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

You're gonna get blocked too anyway since you also violated the 3-revert rule thingy just now. 69.116.155.79 (talk) 13:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

As stated at WP:3RR: "Reverting vandalism is not edit warring" 331dot (talk) 13:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 13:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Congratulations, you've been blocked again. Was it really worth it? Maybe you'll have an answer when your block expires...next year. See you in 2018. —LRG5784 (talk · contribs · email) 22:10, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Seriously? edit

Was it really worth it? Did you get a kick out of harassing me the way you did on my talk page? Look where it got you now. Have fun with your year-Long Wikipedia jail sentence. Goodbye —LRG5784 (talk · contribs · email) 17:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply